Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172715›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

A comparison between antibiotic utilisation in public and private community healthcare in Malaysia.

Audrey Huili Lim, Norazida Ab Rahman, Siti Nur Su'aidah Nasarudin, Tineshwaran Velvanathan, Mary Chok Chiew Fong, Abdul Haniff Mohamad Yahaya, Sheamini Sivasampu

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Audrey Huili LimInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia. audreylim@moh.gov.my.ORCID 0000-0001-6721-1505
Norazida Ab RahmanInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-3969-1745
Siti Nur Su'aidah NasarudinPharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Tineshwaran VelvanathanPharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Mary Chok Chiew FongPharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Abdul Haniff Mohamad YahayaPharmacy Research & Development Branch, Pharmacy Policy & Strategic Planning Division, Pharmaceutical Services Programme, Ministry of Health, Petaling Jaya, Malaysia.
Sheamini SivasampuInstitute for Clinical Research, National Institutes of Health, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0003-2314-6048
Ministry of Health · MYInstitute of Clinical Research · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are two parallel systems in Malaysian primary healthcare services: government funded public primary care and privately-owned practices. While there have been several studies evaluating antibiotic utilisation in Malaysian public healthcare, there is a lack of literature on the use of antibiotics in the private sector. There is a dire need to evaluate the more recent performance of public vs. private community healthcare in Malaysia. As such, this study aimed at measuring and comparing the utilisation of antibiotics in the public and private community healthcare sectors of Malaysia in 2018-2021.

methodsThis study was a retrospective analysis of antibiotic utilisation in Malaysian primary care for the period of 1 January 2018 until 31 December 2021 using the nationwide pharmaceutical procurement and sales data from public and private health sectors. Rates of antibiotic utilisation were reported as Defined Daily Doses per 1000 inhabitants per day (DID) and stratified by antibiotic classes. The secondary analysis included proportions of AWaRe antibiotic category use for each sector and proportion of antibiotic utilisation for both sectors.

resultsThe overall national antibiotic utilisation for 2018 was 6.14 DID, increasing slightly to 6.56 DID in 2019, before decreasing to 4.54 DID in 2020 and 4.17 DID in 2021. Private primary care antibiotic utilisation was almost ten times higher than in public primary care in 2021. The public sector had fewer (four) antibiotic molecules constituting 90% of the total antibiotic utilisation as compared to the private sector (eight). Use of Access antibiotics in the public sector was consistently above 90%, while use of Access category antibiotics by the private sector ranged from 64.2 to 68.3%. Although use of Watch antibiotics in the private sector decreased over the years, the use of Reserve and 'Not Recommended' antibiotics increased slightly over the years.

conclusionAntibiotic consumption in the private community healthcare sector in Malaysia is much higher than in the public sector. These findings highlight the need for more rigorous interventions targeting both private prescribers and the public with improvement strategies focusing on reducing inappropriate and unnecessary prescribing.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsPublic SectorGovernmentHospitals, PrivateHospitals, PublicHumansMalaysiaRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic utilisationAWaReCommunity healthDefined daily doseDU90Primary care

Identifiers

PMID38172715
PMCPMC10762925
OpenAlexW4390532585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.