Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172629›Full record

SynthesisNature human behaviour2024

A research agenda for understanding how social inequality is linked to brain structure and function.

Mark L Hatzenbuehler, Katie A McLaughlin, David G Weissman, Mina Cikara

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Nature human behaviour, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Educational disparities in brain health and dementia across Latin America and the United States.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark L HatzenbuehlerDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. markhatzenbuehler@fas.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-7430-0853
Katie A McLaughlinDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1362-2410
David G WeissmanDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9966-3338
Mina CikaraDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6612-4474

Funding

Neurodevelopmental Mechanisms Underlying Stress Vulnerability during AdolescenceR37MH119194 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI Katie McLaughlin · 2020 to 2026
$10.6M
Deprivation and Threat: Dimensions of Early Experience and Neural DevelopmentR01MH106482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MCLAUGHLIN, KATIE · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Emotional Awareness: An integrative neural mechanism linking childhood trauma with psychopathologyK99MH127248 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WEISSMAN, DAVID G · 2022 to 2023
$246k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH127248NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106482NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH119194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consistent evidence documents powerful effects of social inequality on health, well-being and academic achievement. Yet research on whether social inequality may also be linked to brain structure and function has, until recently, been rare. Here we describe three methodological approaches that can be used to study this question-single site, single study; multi-site, single study; and spatial meta-analysis. We review empirical work that, using these approaches, has observed associations between neural outcomes and structural measures of social inequality-including structural stigma, community-level prejudice, gender inequality, neighbourhood disadvantage and the generosity of the social safety net for low-income families. We evaluate the relative strengths and limitations of these approaches, discuss ethical considerations and outline directions for future research. In doing so, we advocate for a paradigm shift in cognitive neuroscience that explicitly incorporates upstream structural and contextual factors, which we argue holds promise for uncovering the neural correlates of social inequality.

Indexed as

IncomePrejudiceBrainHumansSocial StigmaSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID38172629
PMCPMC11112523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.