Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172535›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2024

Genome-wide polygenic risk scores for colorectal cancer have implications for risk-based screening.

Max Tamlander, Bradley Jermy, Toni T Seppälä, Martti Färkkilä, FinnGen, Elisabeth Widén, Samuli Ripatti, Nina Mars

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Polygenic risk scores in cancer.Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Max TamlanderInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2249-0971
Bradley JermyInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Toni T SeppäläFaculty of Medicine and Health Technology, University of Tampere and TAYS Cancer Centre, Tampere, Finland.
Martti FärkkiläAbdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.
FinnGen
Elisabeth WidénInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Samuli RipattiInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Nina MarsInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. nina.mars@helsinki.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7259-5993
University of Helsinki · FIBroad Institute · US

Funding

Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 285380Academy of Finland (Suomen Akatemia) 331671Tekes (Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation) 2273/31/2017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHereditary factors, including single genetic variants and family history, can be used for targeting colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but limited data exist on the impact of polygenic risk scores (PRS) on risk-based CRC screening.

methodsUsing longitudinal health and genomics data on 453,733 Finnish individuals including 8801 CRC cases, we estimated the impact of a genome-wide CRC PRS on CRC screening initiation age through population-calibrated incidence estimation over the life course in men and women.

resultsCompared to the cumulative incidence of CRC at age 60 in Finland (the current age for starting screening in Finland), a comparable cumulative incidence was reached 5 and 11 years earlier in persons with high PRS (80-99% and >99%, respectively), while those with a low PRS (< 20%) reached comparable incidence 7 years later. The PRS was associated with increased risk of post-colonoscopy CRC after negative colonoscopy (hazard ratio 1.76 per PRS SD, 95% CI 1.54-2.01). Moreover, the PRS predicted colorectal adenoma incidence and improved incident CRC risk prediction over non-genetic risk factors.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that a CRC PRS can be used for risk stratification of CRC, with further research needed to optimally integrate the PRS into risk-based screening.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGenetic Risk ScoreColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRiskRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID38172535
PMCPMC10876651
OpenAlexW4390572214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.