ArticleScientific reports2024
Genotype by environment and genotype by yield*trait interactions in sugar beet: analyzing yield stability and determining key traits association.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes using genotype by trait (GT) and genotype by yield × trait (GYT) methods.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multiple AMMI models investigation to decipher the genotype by environment (G×E) interaction in sugarcane interspecific hybrids for yield and quality traits.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Selection for high-yielding sugarcane ideotypes and multi-trait selection via MGIDI across different harvesting periods improves sugar quality and yield.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Integrated transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses reveal the molecular mechanisms of sugar accumulation and yield trade-off in sugar beet.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Article
- Multi-trait selection for drought-tolerant soybean accessions under contrasting water regimes.PloS one · 2026Article
- Multi-model-based validation of multi-environment trial results in horse gram (Macrotyloma uniflorum Lam. Verdc.).Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Integrated analysis of genotype by yield trait and genotype by environment interactions for selecting superior maize genotypes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Cultivar specific nitrogen and potassium recommendations optimize yield and quality attributes in sugar beet.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Multi-Locus GWAS Mapping and Candidate Gene Analysis of Anticancer Peptide Lunasin in Soybean (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Exploring genomic loci and candidate genes associated with drought tolerance indices in spring wheat evaluated under two levels of drought.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Genetic analysis and association detection of agronomic traits in maize genotypes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Unraveling genotypic interactions in sugar beet for enhanced yield stability and trait associations.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genotype by environment interaction effect and fresh root yield stability of cassava genotypes under contrasting nitrogen regimes.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genotype by environment interaction and stability analysis for harvest date in sugar beet cultivars.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Genotype-by-environment interaction and stability analysis of grain yield of bread wheat (Heliyon · 2024Article
- A comprehensive multivariate approach for GxE interaction analysis in early maturing rice varieties.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Genotype by environment interactions and phenotypic traits stability of the EUCLEG faba bean collection.Frontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genotype by environment interaction significantly influences plant yield, making it imperative to understand its nature for the creation of breeding programs to enhance crop production. However, this is not the only obstacle in the yield improvement process. Breeders also face the significant challenge of unfavorable and negative correlations among key traits. In this study, the stability of root yield and white sugar yield, and the association between the key traits of root yield, sugar content, nitrogen, sodium, and potassium were examined in 20 sugar beet genotypes. The study was conducted using a randomized complete block design with four replications over two consecutive years across five locations. The combined analysis of variance results revealed significant main effects of year, location, and genotype on both root yield and white sugar yield. Notably, two-way and three-way interactions between these main effects on root yield and white sugar yield resulted in a significant difference. The additive main effect and multiplicative interaction analysis revealed that the first five interaction principal components significantly impacted both the root yield and white sugar yield. The linear mixed model results for root yield and white sugar yield indicated that the genotype effect and the genotype by environment interaction were significant. The weighted average absolute scores of the best linear unbiased predictions biplot demonstrated that genotypes 20, 4, 7, 2, 16, 3, 6, 1, 14, and 15 were superior in terms of root yield. For white sugar yield, genotypes 4, 16, 3, 7, 5, 1, 10, 20, 2, and 6 stood out. These genotypes were not only stable but also had a yield value higher than the total average. All key traits, which include sugar content, sodium, potassium, and alpha amino nitrogen, demonstrated a negative correlation with root yield. Based on the genotype by yield*trait analysis results, genotypes 20, 19, and 16 demonstrated optimal performance when considering the combination of root yield with sugar content, sodium, alpha amino nitrogen, and potassium. The multi-trait stability study, genotype 13 ranked first, and genotypes 10, 8, and 9 were identified as the most ideal stable genotypes across all traits. According to the multi-trait stability index, genotype 13 emerged as the top-ranking genotype. Additionally, genotypes 10, 8, and 9 were recognized as the most stable genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.