ArticleScientific reports2024
Predicting cell types with supervised contrastive learning on cells and their types.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Computational modelling of cell identity.The Biochemical journal · 2026Review
- SwarmMAP: swarm learning for decentralized cell type annotation in single cell sequencing data.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Revealing a coherent cell-state landscape across single-cell datasets with CONCORD.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Revealing a coherent cell state landscape across single cell datasets with CONCORD.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- scRDAN: a robust domain adaptation network for cell type annotation across single-cell RNA sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- SwarmMAP: Swarm Learning for Decentralized Cell Type Annotation in Single Cell Sequencing Data.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- AnnoGCD: a generalized category discovery framework for automatic cell type annotation.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful technique that provides high-resolution expression profiling of individual cells. It significantly advances our understanding of cellular diversity and function. Despite its potential, the analysis of scRNA-seq data poses considerable challenges related to multicollinearity, data imbalance, and batch effect. One of the pivotal tasks in single-cell data analysis is cell type annotation, which classifies cells into discrete types based on their gene expression profiles. In this work, we propose a novel modeling formalism for cell type annotation with a supervised contrastive learning method, named SCLSC (Supervised Contrastive Learning for Single Cell). Different from the previous usage of contrastive learning in single cell data analysis, we employed the contrastive learning for instance-type pairs instead of instance-instance pairs. More specifically, in the cell type annotation task, the contrastive learning is applied to learn cell and cell type representation that render cells of the same type to be clustered in the new embedding space. Through this approach, the knowledge derived from annotated cells is transferred to the feature representation for scRNA-seq data. The whole training process becomes more efficient when conducting contrastive learning for cell and their types. Our experiment results demonstrate that the proposed SCLSC method consistently achieves superior accuracy in predicting cell types compared to five state-of-the-art methods. SCLSC also performs well in identifying cell types in different batch groups. The simplicity of our method allows for scalability, making it suitable for analyzing datasets with a large number of cells. In a real-world application of SCLSC to monitor the dynamics of immune cell subpopulations over time, SCLSC demonstrates a capability to discriminate cell subtypes of CD19+ B cells that were not present in the training dataset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.