Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172405›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

ROX index as a predictor of failure of high-flow nasal cannula in infants with bronchiolitis.

Milena Siciliano Nascimento, Bianca Agostini Zólio, Luciana Assis Pires Andrade Vale, Patrícia Angelica de Lima Silva, Thereza Silva Souza, Louise Helena Rodrigues Gonçalves, Linus Pauling Fascina, Cristiane do Prado

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Early Prediction of High-flow Nasal Cannula Failure in Children: Clarifying the Evidence Behind the Pediatric HACOR Score.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Milena Siciliano NascimentoDepartamento de Práticas Assistenciais, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Avenue Albert Einstein, 627-701, São Paulo, SP, 05651-901, Brazil. milenasn@einstein.br.
Bianca Agostini ZólioDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Vila Santa Catarina Municipal Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luciana Assis Pires Andrade ValeDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Patrícia Angelica de Lima SilvaDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Thereza Silva SouzaDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Louise Helena Rodrigues GonçalvesDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Vila Santa Catarina Municipal Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil.
Linus Pauling FascinaDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Cristiane do PradoDepartamento Materno-Infantil, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein · BRHospital Municipal São José · BRHospital São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a relatively recent therapy that has been used to treat respiratory failure. Until now, the criterion for failure requiring escalation to other forms of ventilatory support has remained unclear. This study evaluated how the ROX index predicts the success or failure of HFNC in infants with bronchiolitis. A prospective, observational, multicenter study was conducted in 2 pediatric ICUs. The data were collected at 7 moments. Patients were categorized into failure and success groups according to HFNC. A total of 102 infants were included, 18(17.6%) of whom failed HFNC therapy. For the ROX index, significant differences were observed between the failure 5.8(95%CI 4.7-7.1) and success 7.7(95%CI 7.2-8.2) groups (p = 0.005) at the 12 h evaluation. According to the analysis of the performance of the ROX index, the AUC at 12 h was 0.716(95%CI 0.591-0.842; p = 0.016). The best cutoff range for the ROX index at 12 h was 6.50-7.18, with a sensitivity of 42% and a specificity of 66% at the cutoff of 6.50, and a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 54% at the cutoff of 7.18. We concluded that the ROX index could be effective at predicting the failure of HFNC therapy in infants with bronchiolitis beginning at 12 h after installation.

Indexed as

BronchiolitisRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaChildHumansInfantOxygen Inhalation TherapyProspective StudiesRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38172405
PMCPMC10764845
OpenAlexW4390547100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.