ArticleScientific reports2024
Automated optic disk segmentation for optic disk edema classification using factorized gradient vector flow.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A gated task-attentive multi-task network for unified retinal image analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DB-SegNet: optimized framework for glaucoma detection and optic structure segmentation from retinal fundus images.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Detecting papilloedema as a marker of raised intracranial pressure using artificial intelligence: A systematic review.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
One significant ocular symptom of neuro-ophthalmic disorders of the optic disk (OD) is optic disk edema (ODE). The etiologies of ODE are broad, with various symptoms and effects. Early detection of ODE can prevent potential vision loss and fatal vision problems. The texture of edematous OD significantly differs from the non-edematous OD in retinal images. As a result, techniques that usually work for non-edematous cases may not work well for edematous cases. We propose a fully automatic OD classification of edematous and non-edematous OD on fundus image collections containing a mixture of edematous and non-edematous ODs. The proposed algorithm involved localization, segmentation, and classification of edematous and non-edematous OD. The factorized gradient vector flow (FGVF) was used to segment the ODs. The OD type was classified using a linear support vector machine (SVM) based on 27 features extracted from the vessels, GLCM, color, and intensity line profile. The proposed method was tested on 295 images with 146 edematous cases and 149 non-edematous cases from three datasets. The segmentation achieves an average precision of 88.41%, recall of 89.35%, and F1-Score of 86.53%. The average classification accuracy is 99.40% and outperforms the state-of-the-art method by 3.43%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.