ArticleScientific reports2024
An attenuation field network for dedicated cone beam breast CT with short scan and offset detector geometry.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and performance evaluation of an upright dedicated cone-beam breast CT system.Medical physics · 2026Article
- Soft-tissue lesion and microcalcification detectability in cone-beam breast CT: cascaded system analysis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- Simultaneous reduction of radiation dose and scatter-to-primary ratio using a truncated detector and advanced algorithms for dedicated cone-beam breast CT.Biomedical physics & engineering express · 2025Article
- Understanding the risk of ionizing radiation in breast imaging: Concepts and quantities, clinical importance, and future directions.European journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Maximizing microcalcification detectability in low-dose dedicated cone-beam breast CT: parallel cascades-based theoretical analysis.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The feasibility of full-scan, offset-detector geometry cone-beam CT has been demonstrated for several clinical applications. For full-scan acquisition with offset-detector geometry, data redundancy from complementary views can be exploited during image reconstruction. Envisioning an upright breast CT system, we propose to acquire short-scan data in conjunction with offset-detector geometry. To tackle the resulting incomplete data, we have developed a self-supervised attenuation field network (AFN). AFN leverages the inherent redundancy of cone-beam CT data through coordinate-based representation and known imaging physics. A trained AFN can query attenuation coefficients using their respective coordinates or synthesize projection data including the missing projections. The AFN was evaluated using clinical cone-beam breast CT datasets (n = 50). While conventional analytical and iterative reconstruction methods failed to reconstruct the incomplete data, AFN reconstruction was not statistically different from the reference reconstruction obtained using full-scan, full-detector data in terms of image noise, image contrast, and the full width at half maximum of calcifications. This study indicates the feasibility of a simultaneous short-scan and offset-detector geometry for dedicated breast CT imaging. The proposed AFN technique can potentially be expanded to other cone-beam CT applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.