Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172249›Full record

ReviewSkeletal radiology2024

Preparing MSK radiologists of the future.

Daniel I Rosenthal

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Skeletal radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Daniel I RosenthalDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Yawkey Building, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. DIRosenthal@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0361-5882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The future will bring increasing demands for specialty training of MSK radiologists. These will include requirements for further standardization of curriculum, educational methods, and documentation. This will place further burdens (both temporal and financial) on the fellowship programs and may lead to termination of some programs. There is a risk that increasingly bureaucratic training requirements may "crowd out" the basic conceptual education necessary for the continued growth and relevance of the subspecialty. Educators must find ways to incorporate these aspects into programs even when they are not mandated.

Indexed as

CurriculumRadiologistsRadiologyClinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsForecastingHumansUnited StatesEducationFutureMSKMusculoskeletalRadiologyTraining

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.