Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172136›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning driven segmentation of maxillary impacted canine on cone beam computed tomography images.

Abdullah Swaity, Bahaaeldeen M Elgarba, Nermin Morgan, Saleem Ali, Sohaib Shujaat, Elena Borsci, Israel Chilvarquer, Reinhilde Jacobs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Current progress of digital twin construction using medical imaging.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025
    Review
  10. Evaluation of Caries Detection on Bitewing Radiographs: A Comparative Analysis of the Improved Deep Learning Model and Dentist Performance.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Abdullah SwaityOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Bahaaeldeen M ElgarbaOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nermin MorganOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Saleem AliOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Sohaib ShujaatOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Elena BorsciOral Diagnostic Clinic, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Israel ChilvarquerDepartment of Oral Radiology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Reinhilde JacobsOMFS IMPATH Research Group, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, & Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. reinhilde.jacobs@ki.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The process of creating virtual models of dentomaxillofacial structures through three-dimensional segmentation is a crucial component of most digital dental workflows. This process is typically performed using manual or semi-automated approaches, which can be time-consuming and subject to observer bias. The aim of this study was to train and assess the performance of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based online cloud platform for automated segmentation of maxillary impacted canine on CBCT image. A total of 100 CBCT images with maxillary canine impactions were randomly allocated into two groups: a training set (n = 50) and a testing set (n = 50). The training set was used to train the CNN model and the testing set was employed to evaluate the model performance. Both tasks were performed on an online cloud-based platform, 'Virtual patient creator' (Relu, Leuven, Belgium). The performance was assessed using voxel- and surface-based comparison between automated and semi-automated ground truth segmentations. In addition, the time required for segmentation was also calculated. The automated tool showed high performance for segmenting impacted canines with a dice similarity coefficient of 0.99 ± 0.02. Moreover, it was 24 times faster than semi-automated approach. The proposed CNN model achieved fast, consistent, and precise segmentation of maxillary impacted canines.

Indexed as

Deep LearningTooth, ImpactedCone-Beam Computed TomographyCuspidHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID38172136
PMCPMC10764895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.