Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38172089›Full record

SynthesisDementia (London, England)2024

The experiences of caring for someone with dementia and a learning disability: A qualitative systematic review.

Michelle Hughes, Kerry Hanna, Akpevwoghene Wiles, Ellie Taylor, Clarissa Giebel

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Dementia (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michelle HughesDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK.
Kerry HannaSchool of Health Sciences, University of Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7357-7749
Akpevwoghene WilesDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK.
Ellie TaylorMersey Care NHS Trust, UK.
Clarissa GiebelDepartment of Primary Care and Mental Health, University of Liverpool, UK; NIHR Applied Research Collaboration North West Coast, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0746-0566

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe life expectancy of people with a learning disability is increasing and with this comes a greater risk of developing dementia. Dementia poses new challenges for both family and formal learning disability carers as they try to support dementia's progressive nature and quality of life for their care recipient. This qualitative systematic review explores the evidence base of family and formal carers' experiences and needs of caring for someone with both a learning disability and dementia.

methodsSix electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Prospero, Scopus, CINAHL), were searched in May 2022, utilising a predefined search strategy. Thirteen papers fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in in the review.

resultsThematic synthesis was used to explore and synthesise the qualitative findings of the studies. Four conceptual themes were identified following analysis:

conclusionThere are significant training and educational needs for all carers who support the dual diagnosis of dementia and learning disability. Differences between family and formal carers relate to the organisational support and process available to formal carers. Parity across services combined with sufficiently trained carers may support dementia diagnosis and improve quality of care provided. Further research is needed to address environmental, and economic barriers carers face to facilitate ageing in place for their care recipients.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaLearning DisabilitiesQualitative ResearchHumansQuality of Lifecaregiverdementialearning disabilitiesworkforce

Identifiers

PMID38172089
PMCPMC11163849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.