Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38171931›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2023

Advancing single-cell RNA-seq data analysis through the fusion of multi-layer perceptron and graph neural network.

Xiang Feng, Yu-Han Xiu, Hai-Xia Long, Zi-Tong Wang, Anas Bilal, Li-Ming Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Utilization of machine learning in diagnosis of postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS).Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Prediction ofFrontiers in medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiang FengDepartment of Information Science Technology, Hainan Normal University, 99 Longkun Road, Haikou, Hainan 571158, China.
Yu-Han XiuDepartment of Information Science Technology, Hainan Normal University, 99 Longkun Road, Haikou, Hainan 571158, China.
Hai-Xia LongDepartment of Information Science Technology, Hainan Normal University, 99 Longkun Road, Haikou, Hainan 571158, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2484-9389
Zi-Tong WangDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.
Anas BilalDepartment of Information Science Technology, Hainan Normal University, 99 Longkun Road, Haikou, Hainan 571158, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7760-3374
Li-Ming YangDepartment of Pathophysiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China.

Funding

Foreign Young Talents Program of the State Bureau of Foreign Experts Ministry of Science and Technology China QN2023034001Haikou Science and Technology Plan Project of China 2022-016Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 823RC488National Natural Science Foundation of China 62262019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The advancement of single-cell sequencing technology has smoothed the ability to do biological studies at the cellular level. Nevertheless, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data presents several obstacles due to the considerable heterogeneity, sparsity and complexity. Although many machine-learning models have been devised to tackle these difficulties, there is still a need to enhance their efficiency and accuracy. Current deep learning methods often fail to fully exploit the intrinsic interconnections within cells, resulting in unsatisfactory results. Given these obstacles, we propose a unique approach for analyzing scRNA-seq data called scMPN. This methodology integrates multi-layer perceptron and graph neural network, including attention network, to execute gene imputation and cell clustering tasks. In order to evaluate the gene imputation performance of scMPN, several metrics like cosine similarity, median L1 distance and root mean square error are used. These metrics are utilized to compare the efficacy of scMPN with other existing approaches. This research utilizes criteria such as adjusted mutual information, normalized mutual information and integrity score to assess the efficacy of cell clustering across different approaches. The superiority of scMPN over current single-cell data processing techniques in cell clustering and gene imputation investigations is shown by the experimental findings obtained from four datasets with gold-standard cell labels. This observation demonstrates the efficacy of our suggested methodology in using deep learning methodologies to enhance the interpretation of scRNA-seq data.

Indexed as

Single-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisCluster AnalysisData AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingNeural Networks, ComputerSequence Analysis, RNAcell clusteringgene imputationgraph attention networkgraph neural networkmulti-layer perceptronsingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID38171931
PMCPMC10764207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.