Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38171712›Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2024

Novel Techniques in Imaging Congenital Heart Disease: JACC Scientific Statement.

Ritu Sachdeva, Aimee K Armstrong, Rima Arnaout, Lars Grosse-Wortmann, B Kelly Han, Luc Mertens, Ryan A Moore, Laura J Olivieri, Anitha Parthiban, Andrew J Powell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Bringing paediatric coronary artery abnormalities into view: the role of virtual reality.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. SecondaryJournal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ritu SachdevaDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. Electronic address: sachdevar@kidsheart.com.
Aimee K ArmstrongThe Heart Center, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Rima ArnaoutDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Lars Grosse-WortmannDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
B Kelly HanDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Luc MertensDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Toronto and The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ryan A MooreThe Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Laura J OlivieriDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Anitha ParthibanDepartment of Cardiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andrew J PowellDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

Toward efficient performance for deep learning on medical imagingR01HL150394 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Rima Arnaout · 2020 to 2026
$6.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL150394
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed exponential growth in cardiac imaging technologies, allowing better visualization of complex cardiac anatomy and improved assessment of physiology. These advances have become increasingly important as more complex surgical and catheter-based procedures are evolving to address the needs of a growing congenital heart disease population. This state-of-the-art review presents advances in echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, invasive angiography, 3-dimensional modeling, and digital twin technology. The paper also highlights the integration of artificial intelligence with imaging technology. While some techniques are in their infancy and need further refinement, others have found their way into clinical workflow at well-resourced centers. Studies to evaluate the clinical value and cost-effectiveness of these techniques are needed. For techniques that enhance the value of care for congenital heart disease patients, resources will need to be allocated for education and training to promote widespread implementation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceHeart Defects, CongenitalCardiac Imaging TechniquesEchocardiographyHumansMagnetic Resonance Imagingangiographyartificial intelligencecardiac computed tomographycardiac magnetic resonancedigital twin technologyechocardiography

Identifiers

PMID38171712
PMCPMC10947556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.