Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38171592›Full record

ArticleHuman factors2024

Application of a Human Factors and Systems Engineering Approach to Explore Care Transitions of Sepsis Survivors From Hospital to Home Health Care.

Sungho Oh, Elaine Sang, Michael A Stawnychy, Patrik Garren, Sang Bin You, Melissa O'Connor, Karen B Hirschman, Nancy Hodgson, Teresa Cranston, Juliane Jablonski and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human factors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sungho OhUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1221-2305
Elaine SangUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0002-9570
Michael A StawnychyUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.
Patrik GarrenUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3080-4379
Sang Bin YouUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1424-4140
Melissa O'ConnorUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.
Karen B HirschmanUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4886-7765
Nancy HodgsonUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.
Teresa CranstonPenn Medicine Lancaster General Health, USA.
Juliane JablonskiUniversity of Pennsylvania Health System, USA.
Karen O'BrienPenn Medicine at Home, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-7393-3927
Michael NewcombPenn Medicine at Home, USA.
Melissa SpahrPenn Medicine Chester County Hospital, USA.
Kathryn H BowlesUniversity of Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7740-5725

Funding

Individualized Care for At Risk Older AdultsT32NR009356 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lauren M Massimo, MARY D NAYLOR · 2007 to 2026
$7.8M
Sepsis Survivors' Post-Acute Outcomes: Impact of Early Home Health and MD VisitsR01NR016014 · NINR · VISITING NURSE SERVICE OF NEW YORK · PI BOWLES, KATHRYN HELENE · 2015 to 2025
$4.6M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR016014NINR NIH HHS T32 NR009356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

aimThis study aims to describe the transition-in-care work process for sepsis survivors going from hospitals to home health care (HHC) and identify facilitators and barriers to enable practice change and safe care transitions using a human factors and systems engineering approach.

backgroundDespite high readmission risk for sepsis survivors, the transition-in-care work process from hospitals to HHC has not been described.

methodsWe analyzed semi-structured needs assessment interviews with 24 stakeholders involved in transitioning sepsis survivors from two hospitals and one affiliated HHC agency participating in the parent implementation science study, I-TRANSFER. The qualitative data analysis was guided by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework to describe the work process and identify work system elements.

resultsWe identified 31 tasks characterized as decision making, patient education, communication, information, documentation, and scheduling tasks. Technological and organizational facilitators lacked in HHC compared to the hospitals. Person and organization elements in HHC had the most barriers but few facilitators. Additionally, we identified specific task barriers that could hinder sepsis information transfer from hospitals to HHC.

conclusionThis study explored the complex transition-in-care work processes for sepsis survivors going from hospitals to HHC. We identified barriers, facilitators, and critical areas for improvement to enable implementation and ensure safe care transitions. A key finding was the sepsis information transfer deficit, highlighting a critical issue for future study. APPLICATION: We recommend using the SEIPS framework to explore complex healthcare work processes before the implementation of evidence-based interventions.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsHome Care ServicesSepsisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient TransferQualitative ResearchSurvivorsSystems AnalysisTransitional Carecare transitions and handoffshealth-information technologynursing and nursing systemspatient safetyqualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID38171592
PMCPMC13010172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.