ArticleJournal of radiation research2024
Enhanced induction of abnormal telomere FISH signals in response to oxidative DNA damage.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Telomere dysfunction induces chromosomal instability, which is a driving force in the development of cancers. To examine X-irradiation's effect on telomere integrity, we investigated X-ray-induced abnormalities in telomere signals detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (telomere FISH) in mouse embryo fibroblast cells. The abnormalities were categorized as either extra telomere signals (ETSs) or loss of telomere signals (LTSs). The results indicated that low doses (0.3-0.5 Gy) of X-rays significantly induced ETS but not LTS and that ETS induction was saturated at doses above 0.5 Gy. In addition, treatment with hydrogen peroxide also induced ETS but not LTS. To clarify the involvement of radicals in inducing ETS, we examined the effect of ascorbic acid (AsA) on telomere FISH signals and found that pre-treatment with AsA (5 mM, 2 h), but not post-treatment, significantly suppressed the induction of ETS by X-irradiation. Importantly, neither pre- nor post-treatment with AsA affected X-ray-induced chromosome aberrations. These results suggest that oxidative DNA damage induced by radicals is involved in the induction of ETS. Furthermore, combined treatment with aphidicolin, a DNA replication inhibitor, elevated the induction of ETS by X-irradiation. This observation suggests that DNA replication stress, potentially triggered by oxidative DNA lesions within telomeres, may contribute to the induction of ETS resulting from X-irradiation. Based on these results, we propose that ETS is a sensitive biological marker of oxidative DNA damage in telomere structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.