Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170895›Full record

ArticleBJS open2024

Abdominal drainage after elective colorectal surgery: propensity score-matched retrospective analysis of an Italian cohort.

Stefano Guadagni, Marco Catarci, Francesco Masedu, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Marco Clementi, Giacomo Ruffo, Massimo Giuseppe Viola, Felice Borghi, Gianandrea Baldazzi, Marco Scatizzi and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJS open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. EARLY REFEEDING AFTER COLORECTAL CANCER SURGERY REDUCES COMPLICATIONS AND LENGTH OF HOSPITAL STAY.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 17 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefano GuadagniGeneral Surgery Unit, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8525-084X
Marco CatarciGeneral Surgery Unit, Sandro Pertini Hospital, ASL Roma 2, Roma, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6338-0114
Francesco MaseduDepartment of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Mohammad Ehsanul KarimSchool of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0346-2871
Marco ClementiGeneral Surgery Unit, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Giacomo RuffoGeneral Surgery Unit, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar di Valpolicella (VR), Italy.
Massimo Giuseppe ViolaGeneral Surgery Unit, Cardinale G. Panico Hospital, Tricase, Italy.
Felice BorghiOncologic Surgery Unit, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Gianandrea BaldazziGeneral Surgery Unit, ASST Ovest Milanese, Legnano, Italy.
Marco ScatizziGeneral Surgery Unit, Santa Maria Annunziata & Serristori Hospital, Firenze, Italy.
Felice PirozziGeneral Surgery Unit, ASL Napoli 2 Nord, Pozzuoli, Italy.
Paolo DelrioColorectal Surgical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, 'Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS-Italia', Napoli, Italy.
Gianluca GarulliGeneral Surgery Unit, Infermi Hospital, Rimini, Italy.
Pierluigi MariniGeneral & Emergency Surgery Unit, San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Roma, Italy.
Roberto CampagnacciGeneral Surgery Unit, 'C. Urbani' Hospital, Jesi, Italy.
Raffaele De LucaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II', Bari, Italy.
Ferdinando FicariGeneral Surgery and IBD Unit, Careggi University Hospital, Firenze, Italy.
Giuseppe SicaMinimally Invasive Surgery Unit, Policlinico Tor Vergata University Hospital, Roma, Italy.
Stefano ScabiniGeneral & Oncologic Surgery Unit, IRCCS 'San Martino' National Cancer Center, Genova, Italy.
Andrea LiveraniGeneral Surgery Unit, Regina Apostolorum Hospital, Albano Laziale, Italy.
Marco CaricatoColorectal Surgery Unit, Policlinico Campus BioMedico, Roma, Italy.
Alberto PatritiDepartment of Surgery, Marche Nord Hospital, Pesaro e Fano, Italy.
Italian ColoRectal Anastomotic Leakage (iCral) study group
University of L'Aquila · ITASL Roma · ITAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITAzienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera S.Croce e Carle Cuneo · ITCampus Bio Medico University Hospital · ITCarlo Forlanini Hospital · ITIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITIstituto Tumori Bari · ITMilano Metropoli Development Agency · ITOspedale Infermi di Rimini · ITOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITOspedale Regina Apostolorum · ITOspedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria · ITOspedale Santa Maria Annunziata · ITOspedali Riuniti Marche Nord · ITPoliclinico Tor Vergata · ITUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Italy, surgeons continue to drain the abdominal cavity in more than 50 per cent of patients after colorectal resection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of abdominal drain placement on early adverse events in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

methodsA database was retrospectively analysed through a 1:1 propensity score-matching model including 21 covariates. The primary endpoint was the postoperative duration of stay, and the secondary endpoints were surgical site infections, infectious morbidity rate defined as surgical site infections plus pulmonary infections plus urinary infections, anastomotic leakage, overall morbidity rate, major morbidity rate, reoperation and mortality rates. The results of multiple logistic regression analyses were presented as odds ratios (OR) and 95 per cent c.i.

resultsA total of 6157 patients were analysed to produce two well-balanced groups of 1802 patients: group (A), no abdominal drain(s) and group (B), abdominal drain(s). Group A versus group B showed a significantly lower risk of postoperative duration of stay >6 days (OR 0.60; 95 per cent c.i. 0.51-0.70; P < 0.001). A mean postoperative duration of stay difference of 0.86 days was detected between groups. No difference was recorded between the two groups for all the other endpoints.

conclusionThis study confirms that placement of abdominal drain(s) after elective colorectal surgery is associated with a non-clinically significant longer (0.86 days) postoperative duration of stay but has no impact on any other secondary outcomes, confirming that abdominal drains should not be used routinely in colorectal surgery.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgerySurgical Wound InfectionDrainageHumansPropensity ScoreRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38170895
PMCPMC10763998
OpenAlexW4390547643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.