ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Active Learning Approach for Guiding Site-of-Metabolism Measurement and Annotation.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI-Driven Design Platforms of Next-Generation Antibody Therapeutics.Topics in current chemistry (Cham) · 2026Review
- Metabolite Identification Data in Drug Discovery, Part 2: Site-of-Metabolism Annotation, Analysis, and Exploration for Machine Learning.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Metabolite Identification Data in Drug Discovery, Part 1: Data Generation and Trend Analysis.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Prediction of UGT-mediated phase II metabolism via ligand- and structure-based predictive models.Journal of cheminformatics · 2025Article
- Site-of-Metabolism Prediction with Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Quantification.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Automated Annotation of Sites of Metabolism from Biotransformation Data.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Deciphering Molecular Embeddings with Centered Kernel Alignment.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- An improved dataset of force fields, electronic and physicochemical descriptors of metabolic substrates.Scientific data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ability to determine and predict metabolically labile atom positions in a molecule (also called "sites of metabolism" or "SoMs") is of high interest to the design and optimization of bioactive compounds, such as drugs, agrochemicals, and cosmetics. In recent years, several in silico models for SoM prediction have become available, many of which include a machine-learning component. The bottleneck in advancing these approaches is the coverage of distinct atom environments and rare and complex biotransformation events with high-quality experimental data. Pharmaceutical companies typically have measured metabolism data available for several hundred to several thousand compounds. However, even for metabolism experts, interpreting these data and assigning SoMs are challenging and time-consuming. Therefore, a significant proportion of the potential of the existing metabolism data, particularly in machine learning, remains dormant. Here, we report on the development and validation of an active learning approach that identifies the most informative atoms across molecular data sets for SoM annotation. The active learning approach, built on a highly efficient reimplementation of SoM predictor FAME 3, enables experts to prioritize their SoM experimental measurements and annotation efforts on the most rewarding atom environments. We show that this active learning approach yields competitive SoM predictors while requiring the annotation of only 20% of the atom positions required by FAME 3. The source code of the approach presented in this work is publicly available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.