ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024
Unbiased construction of constitutive relations for soft materials from experiments via rheology-informed neural networks.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Physics-informed deep learning for stochastic particle dynamics estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- AI-driven 3D bioprinting for regenerative medicine: From bench to bedside.Bioactive materials · 2025Review
- Brittle and ductile yielding in soft materials.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to concisely describe the dynamical behavior of soft materials through closed-form constitutive relations holds the key to accelerated and informed design of materials and processes. The conventional approach is to construct constitutive relations through simplifying assumptions and approximating the time- and rate-dependent stress response of a complex fluid to an imposed deformation. While traditional frameworks have been foundational to our current understanding of soft materials, they often face a twofold existential limitation: i) Constructed on ideal and generalized assumptions, precise recovery of material-specific details is usually serendipitous, if possible, and ii) inherent biases that are involved by making those assumptions commonly come at the cost of new physical insight. This work introduces an approach by leveraging recent advances in scientific machine learning methodologies to discover the governing constitutive equation from experimental data for complex fluids. Our rheology-informed neural network framework is found capable of learning the hidden rheology of a complex fluid through a limited number of experiments. This is followed by construction of an unbiased material-specific constitutive relation that accurately describes a wide range of bulk dynamical behavior of the material. While extremely efficient in closed-form model discovery for a real-world complex system, the model also provides insight into the underpinning physics of the material.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.