Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170720›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Usability and acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based hepatitis C virus self-testing among the general population and men who have sex with men in Malaysia.

Huan-Keat Chan, Xiaohui Sem, Elena Ivanova Reipold, Sheela Bai A/P Pannir Selvam, Narul Aida Salleh, Abdul Hafiz Bin Mohamad Gani, Emmanuel Fajardo, Sonjelle Shilton, Muhammad Radzi Abu Hassan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Huan-Keat ChanClinical Research Centre, Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Alor Setar, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6710-7257
Xiaohui SemFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4962-9825
Elena Ivanova ReipoldFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-5161
Sheela Bai A/P Pannir SelvamCheras Health Clinic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4978-4195
Narul Aida SallehKuala Lumpur Health Clinic, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5536-7840
Abdul Hafiz Bin Mohamad GaniMahmoodiah Health Clinic, Johor Bharu, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1261-4179
Emmanuel FajardoFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7561-3368
Sonjelle ShiltonFIND, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1569-8758
Muhammad Radzi Abu HassanClinical Research Centre, Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Alor Setar, Malaysia.
FIND · CHHospital Sultanah Bahiyah · MYHospital Kuala Lumpur · MYNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C self-testing (HCVST) is emerging as an additional strategy that could help to expand access to HCV testing. We conducted a study to assess the usability and acceptability of two types of HCVST, oral fluid- and blood-based, among the general population and men who have sex with men (MSM) in Malaysia. An observational study was conducted in three primary care centres in Malaysia. Participants who were layman users performed the oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST sequentially. Usability was assessed by calculating the rate of errors observed, the rate of difficulties faced by participants as well as inter-reader (self-test interpreted by self-tester vs interpreted by trained user) and inter-operator concordances (self-test vs test performed by trained user). The acceptability of HCV self-testing was assessed using an interviewer-administered semi-structured questionnaire. Participants were also required to read contrived test results which included "positive", "negative", and "invalid". There was a total of 200 participants (100 general population, 100 MSM; mean age 33.6 ± 14.0 years). We found a high acceptability of oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST across both general population and MSM. User errors, related to timekeeping and reading within stipulated time, were common. However, the majority of the participants were still able to obtain and interpret results correctly, including that of contrived results, although there was substantial difficulty interpreting weak positive results. The high acceptability of HCVST among the participants did not appreciably change after they had experienced both tests, with 97.0% of all participants indicating they would be willing to use HCVST again and 98.5% of them indicating they would recommend it to people they knew. There was no significant difference between the general population and MSM in these aspects. Our study demonstrates that both oral fluid- and blood-based HCVST are highly acceptable among both the general population and MSM. Both populations also showed comparable ability to conduct the tests and interpret the results. Overall, this study suggests that HCVST could be introduced as an addition to existing HCV testing services in Malaysia. Further studies are needed to establish the optimal positioning of self-testing alongside facility-based testing to expand access to HCV diagnosis in the country.

Identifiers

PMID38170720
PMCPMC10763960
OpenAlexW4390547286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.