ArticlePloS one2024
Improving prediction of cervical cancer using KNN imputer and multi-model ensemble learning.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk prediction models for frailty in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in neurologyPooled it
- Risk prediction models of compassion fatigue among nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Review
- Profiler: an open web platform for multi-omics analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- An enhanced multi-model ensemble learning architecture for robust network intrusion detection.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Constructing a prediction model for lymph node metastasis in patients with incidental finding of endometrial cancer based on Fully-Connected Network.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2026Article
- Applications of flexible materials in health management assisted by machine learning.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Machine and Deep Learning for the Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Treatment of Cervical Cancer: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Filling-well: An effective technique to handle incomplete well-log data for lithology classification using machine learning algorithms.MethodsX · 2025Article
- A hybrid learning network with progressive resizing and PCA for diagnosis of cervical cancer on WSI slides.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Review on the Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Diagnosing and Treating Cervical Cancer.International journal of women's health · 2025Review
- Leveraging AutoML to optimize dataset selection for improved breast cancer variants pathogenicity prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Attention-enhanced deep learning for cervical cytology: combining convolutional networks with multi-head attention and fuzzy logic.Polish journal of radiology · 2025Article
- Symptomatic associations and sexual differences in depression and communication.Npj mental health research · 2024Article
- Brain tumor classification utilizing pixel distribution and spatial dependencies higher-order statistical measurements through explainable ML models.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Machine learning constructs a diagnostic prediction model for calculous pyonephrosis.Urolithiasis · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a leading cause of women's mortality, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and effective treatment. In line with the imperative of early intervention, the automated identification of cervical cancer has emerged as a promising avenue, leveraging machine learning techniques to enhance both the speed and accuracy of diagnosis. However, an inherent challenge in the development of these automated systems is the presence of missing values in the datasets commonly used for cervical cancer detection. Missing data can significantly impact the performance of machine learning models, potentially leading to inaccurate or unreliable results. This study addresses a critical challenge in automated cervical cancer identification-handling missing data in datasets. The study present a novel approach that combines three machine learning models into a stacked ensemble voting classifier, complemented by the use of a KNN Imputer to manage missing values. The proposed model achieves remarkable results with an accuracy of 0.9941, precision of 0.98, recall of 0.96, and an F1 score of 0.97. This study examines three distinct scenarios: one involving the deletion of missing values, another utilizing KNN imputation, and a third employing PCA for imputing missing values. This research has significant implications for the medical field, offering medical experts a powerful tool for more accurate cervical cancer therapy and enhancing the overall effectiveness of testing procedures. By addressing missing data challenges and achieving high accuracy, this work represents a valuable contribution to cervical cancer detection, ultimately aiming to reduce the impact of this disease on women's health and healthcare systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.