ArticlePloS one2024
MAGA Republicans' views of American democracy and society and support for political violence in the United States: Findings from a nationwide population-representative survey.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Views on democracy and political violence in the United States in 2025: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- Support for authoritarianism and use of force by and against the federal government in the United States in mid-2025: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- Approval of the National Rifle Association and political violence: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Approval of extreme right-wing organizations and social movements and support for political violence in the United States: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- The MAGA movement and political violence in 2024: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- Fear, loathing, and support for political violence in the United States: findings from a nationally representative survey.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2025Article
- Public opinion on civil war in the USA as of mid-2024: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- Trends in views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA, 2022-2024: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2025Article
- Replacement thinking, status threat, and the endorsement of political violence among non-Hispanic white individuals in the US: A cross-sectional study.Preventive medicine reports · 2024Article
- Expectations of and perceived need for civil war in the USA: findings from a 2023 nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2024Article
- Single-year change in views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA: findings from a 2023 nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2024Article
- Firearm Ownership and Support for Political Violence in the United States.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Views of democracy and society and support for political violence in the USA: findings from a nationally representative survey.Injury epidemiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIdentifying groups at increased risk for political violence can support prevention efforts. We determine whether "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) Republicans, as defined, are potentially such a group.
methodsNationwide survey conducted May 13-June 2, 2022 of adult members of the Ipsos KnowledgePanel. MAGA Republicans are defined as Republicans who voted for Donald Trump in the 2020 presidential election and deny the results of that election. Principal outcomes are weighted proportions of respondents who endorse political violence, are willing to engage in it, and consider it likely to occur.
findingsThe analytic sample (n = 7,255) included 1,128 (15.0%) MAGA Republicans, 640 (8.3%) strong Republicans, 1,571 (21.3%) other Republicans, and 3,916 (55.3%) non-Republicans. MAGA Republicans were substantially more likely than others to agree strongly/very strongly that "in the next few years, there will be civil war in the United States" (MAGA Republicans, 30.3%, 95% CI 27.2%, 33.4%; strong Republicans, 7.5%, 95% CI 5.1%, 9.9%; other Republicans, 10.8%, 95% CI 9.0%, 12.6%; non-Republicans, 11.2%, 95% CI 10.0%, 12.3%; p < 0.001) and to consider violence usually/always justified to advance at least 1 of 17 specific political objectives (MAGA Republicans, 58.2%, 95% CI 55.0%, 61.4%; strong Republicans, 38.3%, 95% CI 34.2%, 42.4%; other Republicans, 31.5%, 95% CI 28.9%, 34.0%; non-Republicans, 25.1%, 95% CI 23.6%, 26.7%; p < 0.001). They were not more willing to engage personally in political violence.
interpretationMAGA Republicans, as defined, are more likely than others to endorse political violence. They are not more willing to engage in such violence themselves; their endorsement may increase the risk that it will occur.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.