ArticleJournal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society2024
Social Determinants of Health in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.
Article in Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cognitive impairment in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: A conceptual framework and therapeutic implications.Surgical neurology international · 2026Review
- "Just lose weight": weight-based medical bias and experiential expertise in intracranial hypertension.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Racial, Ethnic, and Socioeconomic Disparities in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension.Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society · 2025Article
- Epidemiological Patterns, Treatment Response, and Metabolic Correlations of Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A United States-Based Study From 1990 to 2024.ASIDE internal medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIdiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) disproportionately affects women from socioeconomically disadvantaged communities, but specific social determinants of health have not been examined.
methodsWe used data from the National Institutes of Health's All of Us Research Program, an ongoing nationwide study of more than 300,000 diverse individuals in the United States. Height and weight were measured at baseline, and participants completed questionnaires about demographics, health care access, and quality of life. Women aged 18-50 years with IIH were identified through electronic health record data, excluding those with venous thrombosis, meningitis, hydrocephalus, or central nervous system neoplasms. We used logistic regression to compare questionnaire responses for IIH cases and controls, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, annual income, and body mass index (BMI).
resultsWe included 416 women with IIH and 107,111 women without IIH. The mean age was 38 years, and 49.3% identified as non-White. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, and BMI, women with IIH were more likely to be unemployed (odds ratio [OR] 1.40, 95% confidential interval [CI]: 1.14-1.71) and report delaying care because of difficulty affording copays (OR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.02-2.10) or specialist care (OR 1.52, 95% CI: 1.06-2.18). They also delayed care because of rural residence (OR 2.08, 95% CI: 1.25-3.47) and transportation limitations (OR 2.23, 95% CI: 1.55-3.20). Although women with IIH were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black (OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.32-2.09), this association lost significance when controlling for BMI and income (OR 1.27, 95% CI: 0.96-1.68).
conclusionsWomen with IIH experience adverse social determinants of health beyond those associated with obesity alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.