ReviewHormones (Athens, Greece)2025
Τhe story of sclerostin inhibition: the past, the present, and the future.
Review in Hormones (Athens, Greece), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in glucocorticoid regulation of bone and the bone marrow niche: Genetic and pharmacological approaches to understand and prevent bone loss.Current opinion in endocrine and metabolic research · 2026Article
- Updates in Cystic Fibrosis Bone Disease in Adults.Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2026Review
- Osteocytes in the Metastatic Bone Niche: Mechanistic Pathways and Therapeutic Targets.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Pathogenesis, the Impact of Different Administration Routes on Bone Mineral Density, and Fracture Risk and Treatment Options-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- In silico identification of sclerostin inhibitors.Molecular diversity · 2026Article
- Bone formation niche dysfunction in osteoporosis: insights from single-cell and spatial transcriptomic studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Sclerostin-silenced human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate bone metabolism in steroid-induced femoral head necrosis.World journal of stem cells · 2025Article
- Addressing osteoblast senescence: Molecular pathways and the frontier of anti-ageing treatments.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025Review
- Aging: A struggle for beneficial to overcome negative factors made by muscle and bone.Mechanisms of ageing and development · 2025Review
- Basic and Clinical Scientists Working Together-Do We Make the Best of Both Worlds?Calcified tissue international · 2025Article
- Effect of genetically predicted sclerostin on cardiovascular biomarkers, risk factors, and disease outcomes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Relation between serum sclerostin and CTRP3 levels and bone mineral density in diabetic postmenopausal women.BMC women's health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sclerostin inhibits osteoblast activity by hampering activation of the canonical Wnt signaling pathway and simultaneously stimulates osteoclastogenesis through upregulation of the receptor activator of NFκB ligand (RANKL). Thus, antibodies against sclerostin (Scl-Abs), besides promoting bone formation, suppress bone resorption and dissociate bone formation from resorption. This dual action results in remarkable increases of bone mineral density which are of a greater magnitude compared to the other antiosteoporotic treatments and are accompanied by decreases of fracture risk at all skeletal sites. The anabolic effect subsides after the first few months of treatment and a predominantly antiresorptive effect remains after this period, limiting its use to 12 months. Furthermore, these effects are largely reversible upon discontinuation; therefore, subsequent treatment with antiresorptives is indicated to maintain or further increase the bone gains achieved. Romosozumab is currently the only Scl-Ab approved for the treatment of severe postmenopausal osteoporosis. Indications for use in other populations, such as males, premenopausal women, and patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, are pending. Additionally, the efficacy of Scl-Abs in other bone diseases, such as osteogenesis imperfecta, hypophosphatasia, X-linked hypophosphatemia, and bone loss associated with malignancies, is under thorough investigation. Cardiovascular safety concerns currently exclude patients at high cardiovascular risk from this treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38170438What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.