Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170434›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2024

Oleogel-S10 in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Case Series Evaluating the Impact on Wound Burden Over Two Years.

Mauricio Torres Pradilla, Erick Álvarez, Mónica Novoa, Ivonne Lozano, Maribel Trujillo

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. From Plant to Patient: A Historical Perspective and Review of Selected Medicinal Plants in Dermatology.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
    Review
  5. The Saudi National Policy and Protocol for Epidermolysis Bullosa.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mauricio Torres PradillaFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud and Hospital Infantil de San José, Bogotá, Colombia. dr.torrespradilla@gmail.com.
Erick ÁlvarezUniversidad De Cartagena, Hospital Infantil Napoleón Franco Pareja, Cartagena, Colombia.
Mónica NovoaFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud and Hospital Infantil de San José, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ivonne LozanoFundación Hospital Pediátrico de la Misericordia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Maribel TrujilloFundación Hospital Pediátrico de la Misericordia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Fundación Hospital San Pedro · COFundación Universitaria de Ciencias de la Salud · COUniversity of Cartagena · CO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, difficult-to-treat, inherited multisystem diseases affecting epithelial integrity. Impaired wound healing is central and can lead to serious clinical complications, deformities, and symptoms with a devastating impact on quality of life (QoL). Dressing changes and wound care are central to the management of EB. Recently Oleogel-S10 (also known as birch bark extract or birch triterpenes) was approved in Europe and the UK for treating EB wounds. This approval was based on data from the EASE phase 3 study, which demonstrated Oleogel-S10 accelerated wound healing, reduced total wound burden, and decreased the frequency of dressing changes in patients with EB. A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for up to 24 months in 13 patients with EB treated with Oleogel-S10 through an early access programme in Colombia. Effectiveness was assessed by measuring body surface area percentage (BSAP) and total body wound burden (EBDASI). Tolerability and safety were monitored throughout. This is the first report to evaluate the effectiveness of Oleogel-S10 in clinical practice. The results showed a reduction in percentage of BSA affected, from a mean of 27.3% at baseline to 10.4% at 24-month follow-up, despite treatment interruptions. A reduction in EBDASI skin activity score of - 16.2 (24 months) together with a reduced skin damage index score of - 15.4 (18 months) was also observed. Physicians, patients, and caregivers perceived faster wound closure. Adherence with therapy by patients was good, and patients expressed satisfaction with treatment and reported improvements in self-esteem, productivity, and social interaction. Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated; however, two patients reported worsening wounds related to gauze adherence. Two deaths during treatment interruption were reported and was not considered related to Oleogel-S10. This study supports the effectiveness of Oleogel-S10 in a real-world scenario in a country with scarce resources for the treatment of EB.

Indexed as

Epidermolysis BullosaEpidermolysis Bullosa DystrophicaHumansOrganic ChemicalsQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesWound HealingoleogelsOrganic ChemicalsBirch bark extractBirch triterpenesBSAPEBDASIEpidermolysis bullosaOleogel-S10Real-world experienceWounds

Identifiers

PMID38170434
PMCPMC10838820
OpenAlexW4390539003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.