Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170367›Full record

ArticleNeotropical entomology2024

Potential of Ocotea indecora Essential Oil for Controlling Drosophila suzukii: Molecular Predictions for Toxicity and Selectivity to Beneficial Arthropods.

Pedro F S Toledo, Sabrina Helena da Cruz Araujo, Javier Guilhermo Mantilla Afanador, Ana Carolina Fernandes Silva, Francisco Paiva Machado, Leandro M Rocha, Eugênio E Oliveira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neotropical entomology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Antibacterial and Antifungal Properties ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pedro F S ToledoDepartamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Sabrina Helena da Cruz AraujoDepartamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. shcaraujo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2718-0369
Javier Guilhermo Mantilla AfanadorGrupo de Pesquisa em Microbiologia e Biotecnologia Agroindustrial, Universidad Catolica de Manizales, Manizales, Caldas, Colombia.
Ana Carolina Fernandes SilvaDepartamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Francisco Paiva MachadoLaboratório de Tecnologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Niterói, Brazil.
Leandro M RochaLaboratório de Tecnologia de Produtos Naturais, Departamento de Tecnologia Farmacêutica, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Niterói, Brazil.
Eugênio E OliveiraDepartamento de Entomologia, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil. eugenio@ufv.br.
Universidade Federal de Viçosa · BRUniversidade Federal Fluminense · BRUniversidad Católica de Manizales · CO

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 150977/2023-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 152366/2022-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 304179/2021-3Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 309890/2022-5Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Finance Code 001Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/200.915/2022Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/210.353/2019Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ 03771-18
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The protection of soft-skinned fruits against Drosophila suzukii has relied primarily on the efficacy of a few synthetic molecules. Despite their short-term efficacy, these molecules can cause environmental pollution, unintendedly affect non-target organisms, and fail to provide sustainable control. The shortfalls of using synthetic pesticides warrant the search for alternatives, such as essential oils extracted from plants, with greater eco-friendlier properties. Here, we chemically characterized and evaluated the toxicity of the essential oil extracted from leaves of Ocotea indecora (Schott) Mez (Lauraceae) against D. suzukii via two exposure pathways (ingestion and contact). We also assessed the selectivity of the essential oil to two predatory natural enemies, Eriopis connexa and Chrysoperla externa and two pollinator bees, Apis mellifera and Partamona helleri. In addition, we conducted in silico predictions to investigate potential interactions between the major compound of the essential oil and the insects' transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. Our chromatographic analysis revealed sesquirosefuran (87%) as the major compound. Higher toxicity to adults of D. suzukii was observed in contact exposure (LC

Indexed as

ArthropodsInsecticidesOcoteaOils, VolatileAnimalsDrosophilaInsect ControlInsecticidesOils, VolatileBeneficial ArthropodsBiorational PesticidesNeotropical FloraSpotted-Wing DrosophilaSustainable Insect Management

Identifiers

PMID38170367
OpenAlexW4390546252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.