Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170321›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2024

Food preferences and nutrient composition in captive Southern brown howler monkeys, Alouatta guariba clamitans.

Pamela Silveira, Ícaro William Valler, Zelinda Maria Braga Hirano, Aline Naíssa Dada, Matthias Laska, Laura Teresa Hernandez Salazar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Pamela Silveira *Indaial Biological Research Center, Bugio Project. Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Regional University of Blumenau, Indaial, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Ícaro William Valler *Indaial Biological Research Center, Bugio Project. Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Regional University of Blumenau, Indaial, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Zelinda Maria Braga Hirano *Indaial Biological Research Center, Bugio Project. Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Regional University of Blumenau, Indaial, Santa Catarina, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-5509
Aline Naíssa Dada *Indaial Biological Research Center, Bugio Project. Department of Exact and Natural Sciences, Regional University of Blumenau, Indaial, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Matthias LaskaIFM Biology, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden. matla69@liu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-2697
Laura Teresa Hernandez SalazarInstituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, C.P. 91000, Xalapa, Mexico. terehernandez@uv.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7567-8068
Universidade Regional de Blumenau · BRLinköping University · SEUniversidad Veracruzana · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of food preferences in captive primates have so far mainly been restricted to frugivorous species. It was therefore the aim of the present study to assess the occurrence of spontaneous food preferences in a mainly folivorous primate, the captive Southern brown howler monkey, and to analyze whether these preferences correlate with nutrient composition. Using a two-alternative choice test, we presented ten male and five female adult Alouatta guariba clamitans with all possible binary combinations of ten types of food that are part of their diet in captivity and recorded their choice behavior. We found the howler monkeys to display the following rank order of preference: banana > mango > watermelon > papaya > beetroot > apple > pear > orange > cucumber > tomato. This preference ranking significantly and positively correlated with the total carbohydrate content and with the sucrose content of the food items. We also found significant positive correlations between the food preference ranking and the content of the minerals copper and magnesium. Male and female howler monkeys did not differ significantly in their food preference rankings. These results suggest this howler monkeys under human care are not opportunistic, but selective feeders with regard to maximizing their net gain of energy as only the content of carbohydrates, but not the contents of total energy, proteins, or lipids significantly correlated with the displayed food preferences. Thus, the food preferences of this primate are similar to those reported in several species of frugivorous primates tested with cultivated fruits and vegetables.

Indexed as

AlouattaFood PreferencesAnimalsFemaleHaplorhiniHumansMaleNutrientsNutrientsAlouatta guariba clamitansCorrelational analysisFood preferencesNutrient compositionSouthern brown howler monkey

Identifiers

PMID38170321
OpenAlexW4390546285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.