Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170309›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2024

Production of cello-oligosaccharides from corncob residue by degradation-synthesis reactions.

Yazhe Liang, Wangli Ji, Xianhua Sun, Zhenzhen Hao, Xiaolu Wang, Yuan Wang, Wei Zhang, Yingguo Bai, Xing Qin, Huiying Luo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Solid Fermentation Products ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yazhe LiangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wangli JiBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12 South Zhongguancun St., Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Xianhua SunState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Zhenzhen HaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiaolu WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Yuan WangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Wei ZhangBiotechnology Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No.12 South Zhongguancun St., Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yingguo BaiState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xing QinState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Huiying LuoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Bin YaoState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China.
Xiaoyun SuState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China. suxiaoyun@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0547-9252
Huoqing HuangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feeding, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Haidian District, No. 2 West Yuanmingyuan Road, Beijing, 100193, China. huanghuoqing@caas.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CN

Funding

China Agriculture Research System of MOF and MARA CARS-41National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2100402National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFA0912301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cellulose-rich corncob residue (CCR) is an abundant and renewable agricultural biomass that has been under-exploited. In this study, two strategies were compared for their ability to transform CCR into cello-oligosaccharides (COS). The first strategy employed the use of endo-glucanases. Although selected endo-glucanases from GH9, GH12, GH45, and GH131 could release COS with degrees of polymerization from 2 to 4, the degrading efficiency was low. For the second strategy, first, CCR was efficiently depolymerized to glucose and cellobiose using the cellulase from Trichoderma reesei. Then, using these simple sugars and sucrose as the starting materials, phosphorylases from different microorganisms were combined to generate COS to a level up to 100.3 g/L with different patterns and degrees of polymerization. Using tomato as a model plant, the representative COS obtained from BaSP (a sucrose phosphorylase from Bifidobacterium adolescens), CuCbP (a cellobiose phosphorylase from Cellulomonas uda), and CcCdP (a cellodextrin phosphorylase from Clostridium cellulosi) were shown to be able to promote plant growth. The current study pointed to an approach to make use of CCR for production of the value-added COS. KEY POINTS: • Sequential use of cellulase and phosphorylases effectively generated cello-oligosaccharides from corncob residue. • Cello-oligosaccharides patterns varied in accordance to cellobiose/cellodextrin phosphorylases. • Spraying cello-oligosaccharides promoted tomato growth.

Indexed as

CellobioseCellulaseOligosaccharidesPhosphorylasesZea maysCellobioseCellulaseOligosaccharidesPhosphorylasesCello-oligosaccharidesCellulaseCorncob residueGrowth promoterPhosphorylase

Identifiers

PMID38170309
PMCPMC13497789
OpenAlexW4390538728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.