ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2024
Long-term Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Women Following Substitution Urethroplasty.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparing ventral and dorsal oral mucosal graft urethroplasty in female urethral stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2025Pooled it
- Outcomes of Redo Dorsal Onlay Buccal Mucosal Graft Urethroplasty After Failed Ventral Urethroplasty in Women.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Factors predicting success following female urethroplasty: an observational study.World journal of urology · 2026Observational
- Comparative Analysis of Dorsal and Ventral Onlay Urethroplasty with Buccal Mucosal Graft in Female Urethral Strictures: A Multi-Center Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the long-term quality of life (QOL) and sexual function (SF) in women who underwent either dorsal on-lay (DO) or ventral inlay (VI) urethroplasty for urethral stricture disease. METHODOLOGY: Between January 2016 and September 2022, women who underwent either dorsal on-lay (DO) or ventral inlay (VI) urethroplasties and had at least a six-month follow-up been included. Using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and WHO-QOL bref questionnaires, the QOL and SF were evaluated. Scores were compared between the two groups after being examined for internal validity. A sub-group analysis was carried out based on the procedure's success.
resultsWith follow-up periods ranging from 6 to 86 months, 25 patients who received VI urethroplasty and 10 patients who underwent DO urethroplasty were included. Both scores demonstrated strong internal consistency. The cumulative QOL and FSFI scores were comparable in both groups (p = 0.53 and p = 0.83, respectively). Significantly high scores were noted in the physical health domain (76.5 ± 9.9 vs 62.33 ± 10.97; p = 0.03; (95% CI = 0.72-24.4)) and the environmental domain (75.75 ± 3.84 vs 66.00 ± 4.24; p = 0.01 (95% CI = 2.64-16.85) in patients with successful VI and DO urethroplasties respectively. Addictions, low socioeconomic status and protracted symptom duration were associated with low QOL scores. Old age was related to low FSFI scores.
conclusionSubstitution urethroplasty, despite the approach, showed good QOL and SF scores. Long symptom duration, addictions, and poor socioeconomic status were associated with low QOL whereas old age independently influenced low FSFI scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.