Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170102›Full record

ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2021

Generalized Shape Metrics on Neural Representations.

Alex H Williams, Erin Kunz, Simon Kornblith, Scott W Linderman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Making models disagree to learn how brains compute.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. InputDSA : Demixing then comparing recurrent and externally driven dynamics.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026
    Article
  15. Graph embeddings for identifying symmetries in Connectomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alex H WilliamsStatistics Department, Stanford University.
Erin KunzElectrical Engineering Department, Stanford University.
Simon KornblithGoogle Research, Toronto.
Scott W LindermanStatistics Department, Stanford University.

Funding

Towards a Unified Framework for Dopamine Signaling in the StriatumU19NS113201 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI SABATINI, BERNARDO L · 2019 to 2023
$18.7M
Neural representation of mating partners by male C. elegansR01NS113119 · NINDS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI LINDERMAN, SCOTT WARREN, SAMUEL, ARAVINTHAN D. · 2019 to 2023
$3.3M
Tracking Changes in High-Dimensional Circuit Behaviors over Long-Term Neural RecordingsF32MH122998 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, ALEXANDER HENRY · 2020 to 2021
$127k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH122998NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS113119NINDS NIH HHS U19 NS113201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the operation of biological and artificial networks remains a difficult and important challenge. To identify general principles, researchers are increasingly interested in surveying large collections of networks that are trained on, or biologically adapted to, similar tasks. A standardized set of analysis tools is now needed to identify how network-level covariates-such as architecture, anatomical brain region, and model organism-impact neural representations (hidden layer activations). Here, we provide a rigorous foundation for these analyses by defining a broad family of metric spaces that quantify representational dissimilarity. Using this framework, we modify existing representational similarity measures based on canonical correlation analysis and centered kernel alignment to satisfy the triangle inequality, formulate a novel metric that respects the inductive biases in convolutional layers, and identify approximate Euclidean embeddings that enable network representations to be incorporated into essentially any off-the-shelf machine learning method. We demonstrate these methods on large-scale datasets from biology (Allen Institute Brain Observatory) and deep learning (NAS-Bench-101). In doing so, we identify relationships between neural representations that are interpretable in terms of anatomical features and model performance.

Identifiers

PMID38170102
PMCPMC10760997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.