ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Deep Learning CT Image Restoration using System Blur Models.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Using a Physics-Based Approach to Standardize Radiomics Values: Experimental Validation in an Anthropomorphic Phantom on a Clinical CT Scanner Using a Range of Dose Levels and Reconstruction Kernels.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026Article
- Deep learning CT image restoration using system blur and noise models.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2025Article
- End-to-end Deep Learning Restoration of GLCM Features from blurred and noisy images.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Restoration of images contaminated by blur is an important processing tool across modalities including computed tomography where the blur induced by various system factors can be complex with dependencies on acquisition and reconstruction protocol, and even be patient-dependent. In many cases, such a blur can be modeled and predicted with high accuracy providing an important input to a classical deconvolution approach. While traditional deblurring methods tend to be highly noise magnifying, deep learning approaches have the potential to improve upon classic performance limits. However, most network architectures base their restoration on data inputs alone without knowledge of the system blur. In this work, we explore a deep learning approach that takes both image inputs as well as information that characterizes the system blur to combine modeling and deep learning approaches. We apply the approach to CT image restoration and compare with an image-only deep learning approach. We find that inclusion of the system blur model improves deblurring performance - suggesting the potential power of the combined modeling and deep learning technique.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.