Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38170033›Full record

Trial reportJournal of interventional cardiology2023

Comparison of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Elective Coronary Stenting: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mohammadjavad Mehdizadeh Parizi, Reza Golchin Vafa, Amin Ahmadi, Reza Heydarzade, Mehrdad Sadeghi, Amin Khademolhossseini, Farhang Amiri, Soroush Khoshnood Mansorkhani, Ali Tavan, Nazanin Hosseini and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of interventional cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05858918 (Evaluation the Effect of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Stable Coronary Syndrome A Randomized Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05858918 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation the Effect of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Stable Coronary Syndrome A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorShiraz University of Medical SciencesRan2022 to 2023Enrolled476ConditionsStable Chronic AnginaArmsClopidogrel, Ticagrelor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammadjavad Mehdizadeh PariziProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Reza Golchin VafaProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Amin AhmadiProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Reza HeydarzadeProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Mehrdad SadeghiProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Amin KhademolhossseiniProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Farhang AmiriProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Soroush Khoshnood MansorkhaniProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Ali TavanProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Nazanin HosseiniProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Mohammad MontaseriProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.
Seyed Ali HosseiniProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4397-1539
Javad KojuriProfessor Kojuri Cardiology Clinic, Shiraz, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8909-897X
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Dual antiplatelet therapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g., clopidogrel and ticagrelor) and aspirin is recommended for at least one year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent further myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis as the major adverse effects of PCI. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from October 2022 to March 2023. Patients who had undergone elective PCI were included in the study. Patients were randomized into two different groups. One group took ASA 80 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg once daily, while the other took ASA 80 mg once daily and ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily. After six months of close follow-up, patients were asked to score their dyspnea on a 10-point Likert scale. They were also asked about dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea (PND), bleeding, and the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). Results: 223 patients were allocated to the clopidogrel group and 214 to the ticagrelor group. In the ticagrelor group, 95 patients (44.3%) reported dyspnea at rest, compared with only 44 patients (19.7%) in the clopidogrel group ( Conclusions: New-onset dyspnea was recorded more frequently with ticagrelor than clopidogrel, yet fewer MACEs occurred with ticagrelor (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT05858918).

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionAspirinClopidogrelDyspneaHemorrhageHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsStentsTicagrelorTreatment OutcomeAspirinClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPurinergic P2Y Receptor AntagonistsTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID38170033
PMCPMC10761231
OpenAlexW4390225122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.