ArticleCureus2023
Artificial Intelligence-Based Diagnostic Support System for Functional Dyspepsia Based on Brain Activity and Food Preference.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy and quality of artificial intelligence models in irritable bowel syndrome: A systematic review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Gut Instincts, Machine Decisions: Evaluating AI Accuracy in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence and digital transformation of gastroenterology and hepatology: A critical review of clinical applications and future challenges.World journal of hepatology · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction of herbal medicine response in functional dyspepsia: protocol for a randomized, assessor-blinded, multicenter trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim Disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) are disorders where no organic clinical abnormalities are detected such as functional dyspepsia (FD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The brain activity of individuals with FD and IBS differs from that of healthy controls. Artificial intelligence can distinguish healthy controls from individuals with DGBI using several biomarkers. This study aimed to establish an artificial intelligence-based diagnostic support system using food preferences and brain activity in patients with DGBI. Methods ROME IV criteria were used to diagnose patients with FD and IBS. Their food preference was scored using a visual analog scale, and brain activity in the prefrontal cortex was investigated using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). The diagnostic model was developed based on the brain activity and visual analog scale scores for food using an artificial neural network model. Results Forty-one participants, including 25 patients with DGBI were enrolled in the study. The accuracy of the artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model using an artificial neural network in differentiating between healthy controls and patients with DGBI and between healthy controls and those with FD were 72.3% and 77.1%, respectively. Conclusions The artificial intelligence-based diagnostic model using brain activity and preference to food images showed sufficiently high accuracy in distinguishing patients with DGBI from healthy controls, and those with FD from healthy controls. Therefore, the fNIRS system provides objective evidence for diagnosing DGBI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.