Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169966›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Secure and privacy-preserving automated machine learning operations into end-to-end integrated IoT-edge-artificial intelligence-blockchain monitoring system for diabetes mellitus prediction.

Alain Hennebelle, Leila Ismail, Huned Materwala, Juma Al Kaabi, Priya Ranjan, Rajiv Janardhanan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. AI Privacy and Security in Healthcare: A Systematic Literature Review.International journal of telerehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alain HennebelleSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Leila IsmailSchool of Computing and Information Systems, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Huned MaterwalaIntelligent Distributed Computing and Systems Lab, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, College of Information Technology, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Juma Al KaabiCollege of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Internal Medicine, United Arab Emirates University, United Arab Emirates.
Priya RanjanSchool of Computer Science, Internet of Things Center of Excellence, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, India.
Rajiv JanardhananFaculty of Medical & Health Sciences, SRM Institute of Science & Technology, India.
The University of Melbourne · AUUnited Arab Emirates University · AESRM Institute of Science and Technology · INUniversity of Petroleum and Energy Studies · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetes Mellitus, one of the leading causes of death worldwide, has no cure to date and can lead to severe health complications, such as retinopathy, limb amputation, cardiovascular diseases, and neuronal disease, if left untreated. Consequently, it becomes crucial to be able to monitor and predict the incidence of diabetes. Machine learning approaches have been proposed and evaluated in the literature for diabetes prediction. This paper proposes an IoT-edge-Artificial Intelligence (AI)-blockchain system for diabetes prediction based on risk factors. The proposed system is underpinned by blockchain to obtain a cohesive view of the risk factors data from patients across different hospitals and ensure security and privacy of the user's data. We provide a comparative analysis of different medical sensors, devices, and methods to measure and collect the risk factors values in the system. Numerical experiments and comparative analysis were carried out within our proposed system, using the most accurate random forest (RF) model, and the two most used state-of-the-art machine learning approaches, Logistic Regression (LR) and Support Vector Machine (SVM), using three real-life diabetes datasets. The results show that the proposed system predicts diabetes using RF with 4.57% more accuracy on average in comparison with the other models LR and SVM, with 2.87 times more execution time. Data balancing without feature selection does not show significant improvement. When using feature selection, the performance is improved by 1.14% for PIMA Indian and 0.02% for Sylhet datasets, while it is reduced by 0.89% for MIMIC III.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)BlockchainDiabetes mellitus type 2DiagnosisDigital healtheHealthLogistic regression (LR)Machine learningPrognosisRandom forest (RF)Risk factorsSmart connected healthcareSupport vector machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID38169966
PMCPMC10758733
OpenAlexW4388949113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.