Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169961›Full record

ReviewMethodsX2024

A review of the characteristics of rainfall simulators in soil erosion research studies.

Tobias Koch, Peter Chifflard, Peter Aartsma, Kerstin Panten

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in MethodsX, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias KochLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Müncheberg, Germany.
Peter ChifflardDepartment for Geography, Philipps-University of Marburg, Germany.
Peter AartsmaJulius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany.
Kerstin PantenJulius Kühn Institute (JKI) - Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Institute for Crop and Soil Science, Braunschweig, Germany.
Julius Kühn-Institut · DELeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rainfall simulators are widely employed in soil erosion studies, and it is common for these simulators to be customized to address specific research questions. Nevertheless, there are certain characteristics that rainfall simulators should fulfill in the context of soil erosion studies. Rainfall simulators should simulate natural precipitation as accurately as possible. It is essential to monitor the size spectrum of generated raindrops, their maximum or terminal velocity, the uniformity of the surface distribution of rain, the kinetic energy and the overall intensity of the rain. This review aims to outline the characteristics and the corresponding measurement methods for rainfall simulators in soil erosion research. Electronic instruments like distrometers are considered more suitable for precise and comprehensive measurements than traditional instroments or literature based derivatives. By adhering to these characteristics, researchers can ensure the reliability and accuracy of their findings. Consequently, this overview serves as a valuable resource for researchers seeking to employ rainfall simulators in their investigations of soil erosion.

Indexed as

Measurement techniquesRainfall simulationReview of the characteristics of rainfall simulators in soil erosion research studies.Water erosion

Identifiers

PMID38169961
PMCPMC10758955
OpenAlexW4389365294

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.