Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169940›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Short-term effectiveness of single-dose intranasal spray COVID-19 vaccine against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in healthcare workers: a prospective cohort study.

Hongfei Mi, Qi Chen, Hongyan Lin, Tingjuan He, Ruixin Zhang, Shuhao Ren, Lingling Liu, Jing Wang, Hua Huang, Meixia Wang and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hongfei MiZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Qi ChenSchool of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Hongyan LinSchool of Public Health, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China.
Tingjuan HeZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Ruixin ZhangZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Shuhao RenZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Lingling LiuZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Jing WangZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Hua HuangZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Meixia WangZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Zhinan GuoXiamen Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Xiamen 361021, China.
Chenghao SuZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University (Xiamen Branch), Xiamen, 361015, China.
Xiamen University · CNZhongshan Hospital of Xiamen University · CNFudan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The pivotal phase 3 efficacy clinical trial has demonstrated that a two-dose regimen of dNS1-RBD (Beijing Wantai Biological Pharmacy Enterprise, Beijing, China) is well-tolerated and provides wide protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, the effectiveness of a single-dose regimen is still unknown. We aimed to estimate the effectiveness of one-dose of dNS1-RBD against symptomatic Omicron infections in real-world conditions. Methods: This prospective cohort study was conducted during an Omicron outbreak among healthcare workers in Xiamen, China, from December 22, 2022 to January 16, 2023. Participants chose to receive single-dose of dNS1-RBD or remain unvaccinated based on personal preference. Healthcare workers daily validated their SARS-CoV-2 infection status, using either RT-PCR or rapid antigen test. A survey questionnaire was conducted to gather information on acute symptoms from individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2. The primary outcome was the symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections after enrollment in the dNS1-RBD recipients or the control group among all participants and by prior COVID-19 vaccination status. Findings: On December 22, 2022, a total of 1391 eligible participants without a history of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled. Among them, 550 received single-dose of dNS1-RBD, while 841 remained unvaccinated. In the total cohort, the range of follow-up time was 1∼26 days. During the study period, a total of 880 symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections were identified in the total cohort. The adjusted vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections and the infections requiring medical attention were 19.0% (95% CI: 6.7, 29.7, Interpretation: When administered as a booster to individuals with a history of inactivated COVID-19 vaccination, a single-dose of dNS1-RBD provides protection against infections requiring medical attention at least in the short-term after vaccination. The data also showed that a single-dose of dNS1-RBD is protective against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections as a primary immunization for individuals without prior exposure, but due to the limited sample size of naïve participants, further research with a larger sample size is needed to make a solid conclusion. Funding: Xiamen Science and Technology Bureau 2022 General Science and Technology Plan Project and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

dNS1-RBDEffectivenessIntranasal spray COVID-19 vaccineSARS-CoV-2Single-dose regimen

Identifiers

PMID38169940
PMCPMC10758709
OpenAlexW4389678640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.