ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimization of lung ultrasound in ultrafast-track anesthesia for non-cyanotic congenital heart disease surgery.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We aimed to explore the feasibility of lung ultrasound for perioperative assessment and the optimal effect of lung ultrasound in reducing lung complications during non-cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery using ultrafast-track anesthesia. Methods: Sixty patients were treated at Shenzhen Children's Hospital between 2019 and 2020. Of these, 30 patients in group N had an indication for extubation and ultrafast-track anesthesia after congenital heart surgery; the tracheal catheter was removed, and the patients were sent to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) for further monitoring and treatment. Another 30 patients were in group L and also had an indication for extubation and ultrafast-track anesthesia; in addition we compared lung ultrasound score (LUS) before and after surgery, when we found the cases that LUS ≥ 15, for whom targeted optimization treatment would be carried out. The tracheal catheter was removed after LUS <15 days before the patients were sent to the CICU. In all cases, the LUS and PaO2/FiO2 ratios (P/F) of both groups were recorded at the time of anesthesia induction (T Results: There was great consistency between LUS and radiographic findings. Comparing the data of the two groups at T Conclusion: Lung ultrasonography can effectively help assess lung conditions. Optimization guided by lung ultrasound in ultrafast track anesthesia can significantly reduce postoperative lung complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.