Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169922›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

A nomogram model combining ultrasound-based radiomics features and clinicopathological factors to identify germline BRCA1/2 mutation in invasive breast cancer patients.

Ruohan Guo, Yiwen Yu, Yini Huang, Min Lin, Ying Liao, Yixin Hu, Qing Li, Chuan Peng, Jianhua Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in patients with HER2-low breast cancer based on ultrasound radiomics.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ruohan GuoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Yiwen YuDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Yini HuangDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Min LinDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Ying LiaoDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Yixin HuDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Qing LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Chuan PengDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.
Jianhua ZhouDepartment of Ultrasound, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, No. 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, PR China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: BRCA1/2 status is a key to personalized therapy for invasive breast cancer patients. This study aimed to explore the association between ultrasound radiomics features and germline BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with invasive breast cancer. Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, 100 lesions in 92 BRCA1/2-mutated patients and 390 lesions in 357 non-BRCA1/2-mutated patients were included and randomly assigned as training and validation datasets in a ratio of 7:3. Gray-scale ultrasound images of the largest plane of the lesions were used for feature extraction. Maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm and multivariate logistic least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were used to select features. The multivariate logistic regression method was used to construct predictive models based on clinicopathological factors, radiomics features, or a combination of them. Results: In the clinical model, age at first diagnosis, family history of BRCA1/2-related malignancies, HER2 status, and Ki-67 level were found to be independent predictors for BRCA1/2 mutation. In the radiomics model, 10 significant features were selected from the 1032 radiomics features extracted from US images. The AUCs of the radiomics model were not inferior to those of the clinical model in both training dataset [0.712 (95% CI, 0.647-0.776) vs 0.768 (95% CI, 0.704-0.835); p = 0.429] and validation dataset [0.705 (95% CI, 0.597-0.808) vs 0.723 (95% CI, 0.625-0.828); p = 0.820]. The AUCs of the nomogram model combining clinical and radiomics features were 0.804 (95% CI, 0.748-0.861) in the training dataset and 0.811 (95% CI, 0.724-0.894) in the validation dataset, which were proved significantly higher than those of the clinical model alone by DeLong's test (p = 0.041; p = 0.007). To be noted, the negative predictive values (NPVs) of the nomogram model reached a favorable 0.93 in both datasets. Conclusion: This machine nomogram model combining ultrasound-based radiomics and clinical features exhibited a promising performance in identifying germline BRCA1/2 mutation in patients with invasive breast cancer and may help avoid unnecessary gene tests in clinical practice.

Indexed as

BRCA mutationInvasive breast cancerNomogramRadiomicsUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID38169922
PMCPMC10758804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.