Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169909›Full record

ArticleJournal of hepatocellular carcinoma2023

Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Wenna Zhang, Xin Cai, Jiayao Sun, Weiwei Wang, Jingfang Zhao, Qing Zhang, Guoliang Jiang, Zheng Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenna ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Xin CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jiayao SunShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Weiwei WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Jingfang ZhaoShanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Qing ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Guoliang JiangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Zheng WangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research · CNFudan University Shanghai Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, evidence of using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to treat moving liver tumors remains lacking. The present study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of PBS CIRT in patients with HCC. Methods: Between January 2016 and October 2021, 90 consecutive HCC patients treated with definitive CIRT in our center were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-eight patients received relative biological effectiveness-weighted doses of 50-70 Gy in 10 fractions, and 32 received 60-67.5 Gy in 15 fractions, which were determined by the tumor location and normal tissue constraints. Active motion-management techniques and necessary strategies were adopted to mitigate interplay effects efficiently. Oncologic outcomes and toxicities were evaluated. Results: The median follow-up time was 28.6 months (range 5.7-74.6 months). The objective response rate was 75.0% for all 90 patients with 100 treated lesions. The overall survival rates at 1-, 2- and 3-years were 97.8%, 83.3% and 75.4%, respectively. The local control rates at 1-, 2- and 3-years were 96.4%, 96.4% and 93.1%, respectively. Radiation-induced liver disease was not documented, and 4 patients (4.4%) had their Child-Pugh score elevated by 1 point after CIRT. No grade 3 or higher acute non-hematological toxicities were observed. Six patients (6.7%) experienced grade 3 or higher late toxicities. Conclusion: The active scanning technique was clinically feasible to treat HCC by applying necessary mitigation measures for interplay effects. The desirable oncologic outcomes as well as favorable toxicity profiles presented in this study will be a valuable reference for other carbon-ion centers using the PBS technique and local effect model-based system, and add to a growing body of evidence about the role of CIRT in the management of HCC.

Indexed as

carbon ion radiotherapyhepatocellular carcinomalocal effect modelpencil beam scanning

Identifiers

PMID38169909
PMCPMC10759913
OpenAlexW4390413698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.