ArticleHeliyon2024
Deep learning of heart-sound signals for efficient prediction of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comparing machine learning models and traditional approaches for predicting obstructive coronary artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic performance of coronary artery disease prediction model (CAD-score system) based on phonocardiogram: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Extraction of Acoustic Features via Empirical Wavelet Transform to Determine Stenosis Degree of the Left Anterior Descending Artery Based on the Diastolic Heart Sounds of 75 Participants.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2026Article
- Region guided mask R-CNN with Haralick ResNet fusion for accurate coronary artery disease detection in computed tomography angiography images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Coronary artery disease diagnosis with signal processing and machine learning of heart sound signals: a systematic review.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Explainable attention-based deep learning for classification and interpretation of heart murmurs using phonocardiograms.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Using machine learning involving diagnoses and medications as a risk prediction tool for post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) in primary care.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of machine learning model to predict early death of melanoma brain metastasis patients.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- An explainable dual-modal diagnostic model for coronary artery disease: a feature-gated approach using tongue and facial image features.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Deep learning fusion framework for automated coronary artery disease detection using raw heart sound signals.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Beat-by-Beat Estimation of Hemodynamic Parameters in Left Ventricle Based on Phonocardiogram and Photoplethysmography Signals Using a Deep Learning Model: Preliminary Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Deep Learning in Heart Sound Analysis: From Techniques to Clinical Applications.Health data science · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Due to the limitations of current methods for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD), many individuals are mistakenly or unnecessarily referred for coronary angiography (CAG). Objectives: Our goal is to create a comprehensive database of heart sounds in CAD and develop accurate deep learning algorithms to efficiently detect obstructive CAD based on heart sound signals. This will enable effective screening before undergoing CAG. Methods: We included 320 subjects suspected of CAD who underwent CAG. We employed advanced filtering techniques and state-of-the-art deep learning models (VGG-16, 1D CNN, and ResNet18) to analyze the heart sound signals and identify obstructive CAD (defined as at least one ≥50 % stenosis). To assess the performance of our models, we prospectively recruited an additional 80 subjects for testing. Results: In the test set, VGG-16 exhibited the highest performance with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.834 (95 % CI, 0.736-0.930), while ResNet-18 and CNN-7 achieved AUCs of only 0.755 (95 % CI, 0.614-0.819) and 0.652 (95 % CI, 0.554-0.770) respectively. VGG-16 demonstrated a sensitivity of 80.4 % and specificity of 86.2 % in the test set. The combined diagnostic model of VGG and DF scores achieved an AUC of 0.915 (95 % CI: 0.855-0.974), and the AUC for VGG combined with PTP scores was 0.908 (95 % CI: 0.845-0.971). The sensitivity and specificity of VGG-16 exceeded 0.85 in patients with coronary artery occlusion and those with 3 vascular lesions. Conclusions: Our deep learning model, based on heart sounds, offers a non-invasive and efficient screening method for obstructive CAD. It is expected to significantly reduce the number of unnecessary referrals for downstream screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.