Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169826›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation2024

A High Incidence of Perineal Post-Related Complications After Hip Arthroscopy Is Self-Reported by Patients in Anonymous Online Forums.

Brendan M Holderread, Austin E Wininger, Justin Cho, Deven Patel, Anthony Echo, R Chad Mather, Matthew J Kraeutler, Joshua D Harris

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Postless versus traditional hip arthroscopy: A multilevel meta-analysis of current evidence on efficacy and safety.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Complications in hip Arthroscopy: Recognizing and managing adverse events.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Review
  6. The Perineal Post for Hip Arthroscopy Is Dead-Or at Least It Should Be.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brendan M HolderreadHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Outpatient Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Austin E WiningerHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Outpatient Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Justin ChoHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Outpatient Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Deven PatelHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Outpatient Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Anthony EchoInstitute for Reconstructive Surgery, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
R Chad MatherDuke University Orthopedic Surgery, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A.
Matthew J KraeutlerHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Outpatient Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Joshua D HarrisHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Outpatient Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Houston Methodist · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate online, self-reported pudendal nerve or perineal injuries related to the use of a perineal post during hip arthroscopy. Methods: Public posts on Reddit and the Health Organization for Pudendal Education were searched to identify anonymous individuals reporting symptoms of pudendal nerve or perineal injury following hip arthroscopy. Included posts were by any individual with a self-reported history of hip arthroscopy who developed symptoms of pudendal nerve injury or damage to the perineal soft tissues. Demographic information and details about a person's symptoms and concerns were collected from each post. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: Twenty-three online posts reported on a perineal post-related complication following hip arthroscopy. Sex information was available in 16 (70%) posts (8 male, 8 female). Twenty-two posts reported a sensory injury, and 4 posts reported a motor injury with sexual consequences (sexual dysfunction, dyspareunia, impotence). Symptom duration was available in 15 (65%) posts (8 temporary, 7 permanent). Permanent symptoms included paresthesia of the perineum or genitals (7) and sexual complaints (5). Two posts stated they were counseled preoperatively about the possibility of this injury. Zero patients reported that a postless hip arthroscopy alternative was an option made available to them before surgery. Conclusions: A high incidence of permanent pudendal nerve, perineal skin, and genitourinary/sexual complications are self-reported and discussed online by patients who have undergone post-assisted hip arthroscopy. These patients report being uninformed and undereducated about the possibility of sustaining a post-related complication. No patient reported being informed of postless hip arthroscopy preoperatively. Clinical Relevance: Identifying and evaluating self-reported patient information in online medical forums can provide important information about patient experiences and outcomes.

Identifiers

PMID38169826
PMCPMC10759173
OpenAlexW4390380133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.