Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169778›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2024

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation combined with lenvatinib plus camrelizumab as conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study.

Xu-Kun Wu, Lan-Fang Yang, Yu-Feng Chen, Zhong-Wu Chen, Hao Lu, Xue-Yi Shen, Min-Hui Chi, Liang Wang, Hui Zhang, Jia-Fei Chen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Xu-Kun WuDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Lan-Fang YangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Yu-Feng ChenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Zhong-Wu ChenDepartment of Intervention, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Hao LuDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Xiamen Traditional Chinese Medical Hospital, Xiamen, China.
Xue-Yi ShenDepartment of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The Zhangzhou Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Zhangzhou, China.
Min-Hui ChiDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Liang WangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Hui ZhangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Jia-Fei ChenDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Hospital of Putian City, Putian, China.
Jing-Yao HuangDepartment of Intervention, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yong-Yi ZengDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Mengchao Hepatobiliary Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Mao-Lin YanDepartment of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Zhi-Bo ZhangDepartment of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Fujian Medical University · CNFujian Provincial Cancer Hospital · CNFujian Provincial Hospital · CNPutian University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The synergistic effect of locoregional therapy in combination with systemic therapy as a conversion therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE) combined with lenvatinib and camrelizumab (TACE + LEN + CAM) as conversion therapy for uHCC. Methods: This single-arm, multicentre, prospective study was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Patients (aged 18-75 years) diagnosed with uHCC, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score (ECOG-PS) of 0-1 and Child-Pugh class A received camrelizumab (200 mg, every 3 weeks) and lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥60 kg: 12 mg/day; <60 kg: 8 mg/day) after TACE treatment. Surgery was performed after tumour was assessed as meeting the criteria for resection. Patients who did not meet the criteria for surgery continued to receive triple therapy until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (mRECIST) and safety. Secondary endpoints included the surgical conversion rate, radical (R0) resection rate, and disease control rate (DCR). This study was registered with Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050410). Findings: Between Oct 25, 2021, and July 20, 2022, 55 patients were enrolled. As of the data cutoff on June 1, 2023, the median follow-up was 13.3 months (IQR 10.6-15.9 months). The best tumour response to triple therapy was complete response (CR) in 9 (16.4%) patients, partial response (PR) in 33 (60.0%) patients, stable disease (SD) in 5 (9.1%) patients, or progressive disease (PD) in 7 (12.7%) patients. The ORR was 76.4% (42/55, 95% CI, 65.2-87.6%), and the DCR was 85.5% (47/55, 95% CI, 76.2-94.8%) per mRECIST. Twenty-four (43.6%) of the 55 patients suffered from grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). No grade 5 TRAEs occurred. A total of 30 (30/55, 54.5%) patients were converted to resectable HCC and 29 (29/55, 52.7%) patients underwent resection. The R0 resection rate was 96.6% (28/29). The major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in the surgery population were 65.5% (19/29) and 20.7% (6/29), respectively. Only one patient developed a Clavien-Dindo IIIa complication (abdominal infection). No Clavien-Dindo IIIb-V complications occurred. The median OS and median PFS were not reached. Interpretation: The triple therapy (TACE + LEN + CAM) is promising active for uHCC with a manageable safety. Moreover, triple therapy has good conversion efficiency and the surgery after conversion therapy is feasible and safe. To elucidate whether patients with uHCC accepting surgical treatment after the triple therapy can achieve better survival benefits than those who receive triple therapy only, well-designed randomised controlled trials are needed. Funding: This study was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China (2022J01691) and the Youth Foundation of Fujian Province Health Science and Technology Project, China (2022QNA035).

Indexed as

Conversion therapyLenvatinibPD-1 inhibitorTranscatheter arterial chemoembolisation (TACE)Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC)

Identifiers

PMID38169778
PMCPMC10758712
OpenAlexW4389636650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.