Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169567›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of medical sciences2024

Appraising and comparing the role of autogenous periosteal graft as a barrier membrane in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis cases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jui Bhandare, Swapna A Mahale, Saquib S Abullais, Ankita Katkurwar, Saad M AlQahtani, Youssef A Algarni, Shaik Mohammed Asif

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of medical sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Recent Use of Hyaluronic Acid in Dental Medicine.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jui BhandareDepartment of Periodontology, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, 422003, India.
Swapna A MahaleDepartment of Periodontology, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, 422003, India.
Saquib S AbullaisDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, KSA.
Ankita KatkurwarDepartment of Periodontology, MGV's KBH Dental College and Hospital, Nashik, 422003, India.
Saad M AlQahtaniDepartment of Periodontics and Community Dental Sciences, King Khalid University, Abha, 61421, KSA.
Youssef A AlgarniDepartment of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia.
Shaik Mohammed AsifDepartment of Diagnostic Science and Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, King Khalid University, Abha 61321, Saudi Arabia.
King Khalid University · SAKarmaveer Bhausaheb Hiray Dental College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periodontal regeneration refers to procedures aimed at restitution of lost supporting tissue around the periodontally compromised tooth. Regenerative procedures very often include the use of barrier materials to encourage the growth of key surrounding tissues. The current study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of autogenous periosteal graft as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients. A total of four data bases MEDLINE (by PubMed), Cochrane database, EBSCO, and Google Scholar were explored to identify the studies in English up to December 2022. An additional hand search of relevant journals was also done. A team of three independent reviewers screened the retrieved articles using the inclusion criteria. Randomized control trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of autogenous periosteal grafts in the treatment of intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis cases were included in the study. A total of six relevant articles were recognized for data procurement. A total of 117 patients with 68 sites with an age range between 18 years and 55 years were selected. Outcome variables examined were pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), radiographic bone defect fill (BDF), gingival recession (GR), plaque index (PI), gingival index (GI) and bleeding on probing (BOP). Data were analyzed using Revman 5.3 software. The mean differences and 95% confidence interval were used to illustrate the estimate of effect size. There is an equal effect in both groups for the PI, GI, and BOP reduction. For PD reduction, the result was in the favor of periosteal graft with open flap debridement (OFD) group. For CAL gain, radiographic BDF and GR, results also favored the periosteal graft, but no statistically significant difference was found amongst the groups. Within the limitation of the study, it seems that the autogenous periosteal graft can be used successfully along with OFD to treat intrabony defects in chronic periodontitis patients.

Indexed as

Alveolar Bone LossChronic PeriodontitisGingival RecessionAdolescentAdultHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultautogenous periosteal graftchronic periodontitisintrabony defectsmeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38169567
PMCPMC10758144
OpenAlexW4389340079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.