Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169441›Full record

Observational studyThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2024

Association of piperacillin/tazobactam MIC and mortality in a cohort of ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli bloodstream infections treated with piperacillin/tazobactam and carbapenems: a multicentric propensity score-weighted observational cohort study.

Emanuele Rando, Federica Salvati, Flavio Sangiorgi, Francesca Catania, Elisa Leone, Alessandra Oliva, Francesco Di Gennaro, Barbara Fiori, Francesca Cancelli, Sara Figliomeni and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Emanuele RandoDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6573-9584
Federica SalvatiDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2273-0683
Flavio SangiorgiDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Francesca CataniaDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Elisa LeoneDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra OlivaDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-7975
Francesco Di GennaroDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Polyclinic Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Barbara FioriDipartimento di Scienze di Laboratorio e Infettivologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesca CancelliDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sara FigliomeniDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesca BobbioDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Federica SaccoDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Davide Fiore BavaroDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Polyclinic Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Lucia DiellaDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Polyclinic Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Alessandra BelatiDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Polyclinic Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Annalisa SaracinoDepartment of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area (DiMePRe-J), Unit of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari 'A. Moro', Polyclinic Hospital, Bari, Italy.
Claudio Maria MastroianniDepartment of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Massimo FantoniDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Rita MurriDipartimento di Sicurezza e Bioetica-Sezione di Malattie Infettive, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the impact of piperacillin/tazobactam MICs on in-hospital 30 day mortality in patients with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Escherichia coli bloodstream infection treated with piperacillin/tazobactam, compared with those treated with carbapenems.

methodsA multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in three large academic hospitals in Italy between 2018 and 2022. The study population comprised patients with monomicrobial third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli bloodstream infection, who received either piperacillin/tazobactam or carbapenem therapy within 48 h of blood culture collection. The primary outcome was in-hospital 30 day all-cause mortality. A propensity score was used to estimate the likelihood of receiving empirical piperacillin/tazobactam treatment. Cox regression models were performed to ascertain risk factors independently associated with in-hospital 30 day mortality.

resultsOf the 412 consecutive patients included in the study, 51% received empirical therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam, while 49% received carbapenem therapy. In the propensity-adjusted multiple Cox model, the Pitt bacteraemia score [HR 1.38 (95% CI, 0.85-2.16)] and piperacillin/tazobactam MICs of 8 mg/L [HR 2.35 (95% CI, 1.35-3.95)] and ≥16 mg/L [HR 3.69 (95% CI, 1.86-6.91)] were significantly associated with increased in-hospital 30 day mortality, while the empirical use of piperacillin/tazobactam was not found to predict in-hospital 30 day mortality [HR 1.38 (95% CI, 0.85-2.16)].

conclusionsPiperacillin/tazobactam use might not be associated with increased mortality in treating third-generation cephalosporin-resistant E. coli bloodstream infections when the MIC is <8 mg/L.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsSepsisAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCeftriaxoneCohort StudiesEscherichia coliHumansPenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationPropensity ScoreRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCarbapenemsCeftriaxonePenicillanic AcidPiperacillinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination

Identifiers

PMID38169441
PMCPMC10832597
OpenAlexW4390531324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.