Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38169406›Full record

Trial reportJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2024

Effect of bone marrow aspiration concentrate and platelet-rich plasma combination in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized, prospective, double-blinded study.

Yu-Chuan Lin, Yu-Jen Chen, Tsang-Yu Fan, Pei-Hsi Chou, Cheng-Chang Lu

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Orthobiologics in anterior cruciate ligament injuries.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu-Chuan LinDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Yu-Jen ChenDepartment of Radiology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Tsang-Yu FanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Pei-Hsi ChouDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Cheng-Chang LuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. cclu0880330@gmail.com.
Kaohsiung Medical University · TWKaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital · TW

Funding

Kaohsiung Medial University, Taiwan KMU-TC112A02Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital, Taiwan H-112-002Ministry of Health and Welfare MOHW107-TDU-B-212-123006Ministry of Health and Welfare MOHW108-TDU-B-212-133006Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan MOST 111-2314-B-037-057-Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan NSTC 112-2314-B-037-100-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe effect of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) combination in enhancing graft maturation and tendon-bone tunnel interfacial healing after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains unclear. We hypothesised that BMAC and PRP combination could lead to better clinical results and better graft maturation/interface healing than PRP alone or conventional ACL reconstruction without any other biologic augmentation.

methodsIn this randomised double-blind prospective study, patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery were randomly assigned into three groups: (1) control group (without any biologic augmentation), (2) PRP treatment group, and (3) combined BMAC and PRP (BMAC + PRP) group. Moreover, they were evaluated using the clinical functional score, laxity examination, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis.

resultsNo significant difference was observed in the improvement of functional scores among groups. However, laxity improvement at 24 weeks showed a significant difference with the BMAC + PRP group having the lowest laxity. MRI analysis showed no significant change in whole graft maturation among groups. In particular, the BMAC + PRP group showed delayed signal peak and higher graft signal at 24 weeks compared with the other two groups; however, the difference was not significant. With regard to tendon-bone interfacial healing, the BMAC + PRP group showed significantly wider tendon-bone interface in the femoral bone tunnel at 24 weeks compared with the other two groups. Moreover, the BMAC + PRP group showed significantly higher peri-tunnel edema signal in the femoral bone tunnel at 12 weeks compared with the other two groups.

conclusionPRP alone and BMAC and PRP combination showed limited enhancing effect in clinical function, graft maturation and tendon-bone interfacial healing compared with control (no additional treatment). When BMAC is used in ACL reconstruction, the possibility of greater inflammation in the early stage to graft maturation and bone tunnel healing should be considered.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionBiological ProductsPlatelet-Rich PlasmaBone MarrowHumansProspective StudiesBiological ProductsGraft healingGraft maturationLaxityMRI

Identifiers

PMID38169406
PMCPMC10763110
OpenAlexW4390521366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.