ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2024
What Clinicians and Researchers Should Know About the Evolving Field of Advance Care Planning: a Narrative Review.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prognostic understanding interventions in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Pooled it
- Effectiveness of Nurse Led Advance Care Planning Intervention for Chronic Respiratory Diseases: A Meta-Analysis.Nursing open · 2025Pooled it
- Trial
- Facilitated Versus Patient-Directed Advance Care Planning Among Patients With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JCO oncology practice · 2025Trial
- Effects of advance care planning on hope, anxiety, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in older adults with cancer: A randomized controlled study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Trial
- Sharing health care wishes among older adults with cognitive impairment in primary care: Results from a randomized controlled trial.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024Trial
- Article
- Relationships Between Advance Care Planning Engagement, Patients' Religious Practices, and Spirituality.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Qualitative Analysis of Community Dwelling Older Adults' Advance Care Planning Interviews: Patients Want a Chance.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2026Article
- Advance care planning for patients with advanced multiple long-term conditions: a qualitative thematic analysis of health and social care professionals' perspectives.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Core Elements of Goals of Care Initiatives Across Eight Health Systems.Journal of pain and symptom management · 2026Article
- A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Integrated Nephrology and Palliative Care Implemented at a Safety-Net Hospital.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Participant Perceptions of a Trauma-Informed Advanced Care Planning Intervention: A Qualitative Study.Journal of palliative medicine · 2026Article
- Patients' attitudes towards advance care planning (ACP) and factors affecting ACP discussion: A cross-sectional questionnaire study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Enhancing Advance Directive Completion Among Older Adults in the Geriatrics Clinic in Indiana, USA: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Bridging Dementia Care in Japan: The Emerging Role of General Medicine Physicians.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Community Engagement to explore Surrogate Decision-Making for HIV+ African Americans: a pilot study.Medical research archives · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Novel Goals-of-Care Discussion Priming Tool (MyCare) in Inpatient General Internal Medicine Ward Settings: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
- Navigating the path to planned endings: understanding Chinese older adults' engagement with advance care planning through constructivist grounded theory.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advance care planning (ACP) has been recognized as crucial by patients, families, and clinicians; however, different definitions and measurements have led to inconsistencies in practice and mixed evidence in the literature. This narrative review explores ACP's evolution, innovations, and outcomes using thematic analysis to synthesize data from randomized controlled trials, reviews, and editorials. Key findings include (1) ACP has evolved over the past several decades from a sole focus on code status and advance directive (AD) forms to a continuum of care planning over the life course focused on tailored preparation for patients and surrogate decision-makers and (2) ACP measurement has evolved from traditional outcome metrics, such as AD completion, to a comprehensive outcomes framework that includes behavior change theory, systems, implementation science, and a focus on surrogate outcomes. Since the recent development of an ACP consensus definition and outcomes framework, high-quality trials have reported mainly positive outcomes for interventions, especially for surrogates, which aligns with the patient desire to relieve decision-making burden for loved ones. Additionally, measurement of "clinically meaningful" ACP information, including documented goals of care discussions, is increasingly being integrated into electronic health records (EHR), and emerging, real-time assessments and natural language processing are enhancing ACP evaluation. To make things easier for patients, families, and care teams, clinicians and researchers can use and disseminate these evolved definitions; provide patients validated, easy-to-use tools that prime patients for conversations and decrease health disparities; use easy-to-access clinician training and simple scripts for interdisciplinary team members; and document patients' values and preferences in the medical record to capture clinically meaningful ACP so this information is available at the point of care. Future efforts should focus on efficient implementation, expanded reimbursement options, and seamless integration of EHR documentation to ensure ACP's continued evolution to better serve patients and their care partners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.