Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168992›Full record

ArticleNature biotechnology2024

Discovery of sparse, reliable omic biomarkers with Stabl.

Julien Hédou, Ivana Marić, Grégoire Bellan, Jakob Einhaus, Dyani K Gaudillière, Francois-Xavier Ladant, Franck Verdonk, Ina A Stelzer, Dorien Feyaerts, Amy S Tsai and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Innovations in biomarker stratification for precision oncology.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Decoding TNBC architecture.Nature cancer · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Julien Hédou *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Ivana Marić *Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9441-521X
Grégoire Bellan *Télécom Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-8062
Jakob Einhaus *Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Dyani K GaudillièreDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3017-5939
Francois-Xavier LadantDepartment of Economics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Franck VerdonkDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7061-5594
Ina A StelzerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9974-4661
Dorien FeyaertsDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0795-6625
Amy S TsaiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2380-6424
Edward A GanioDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Maximilian SabayevDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Joshua GillardDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Jonas AmarDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Amelie CambrielDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Tomiko T OskotskyBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Alennie RoldanBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8186-5318
Jonathan L GolobDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Marina SirotaBakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7246-6083
Thomas A BonhamDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Masaki SatoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6724-7786
Maïgane DiopDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Xavier DurandÉcole Polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, Paris, France.
Martin S AngstDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1550-8136
David K StevensonDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Nima AghaeepourDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6117-8764
Andrea MontanariDepartment of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Brice GaudillièreDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative & Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. gbrice@stanford.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3475-5706
Stanford Medicine · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USÉcole Polytechnique · FRHarvard University · USRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSorbonne Université · FRTélécom Paris · FRUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan · US

Funding

Preeclampsia to cardiovascular disease: Life course analysis of biomarkers and riskR01HL139844 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HLATKY, MARK A., WINN, VIRGINIA D · 2018 to 2021
$9.0M
RESOURCE-BASED CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF PRECISION MEDICINE IN RHEUMATOLOGYP30AR070155 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Mary C Nakamura · 2016 to 2026
$8.2M
UCSF Stanford Endometriosis Center for Discovery, Innovation, Training and Community EngagementP01HD106414 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI OPOKU-ANANE, JESSICA · 2021 to 2025
$7.1M
Machine Learning for Integrative Modeling of the Immune System in Clinical SettingsR35GM138353 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI AGHAEEPOUR, NIMA · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
Harnessing the human monocyte system to improve surgical recoveryR35GM137936 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GAUDILLIERE, BRICE · 2020 to 2024
$2.0M
Neuromodulation of maternal immune adaptations in pregnancyK99HD105016 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STELZER, INA · 2021 to 2022
$263k
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL139844NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR070155NICHD NIH HHS K99 HD105016NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD106414NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM137936NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM138353
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adoption of high-content omic technologies in clinical studies, coupled with computational methods, has yielded an abundance of candidate biomarkers. However, translating such findings into bona fide clinical biomarkers remains challenging. To facilitate this process, we introduce Stabl, a general machine learning method that identifies a sparse, reliable set of biomarkers by integrating noise injection and a data-driven signal-to-noise threshold into multivariable predictive modeling. Evaluation of Stabl on synthetic datasets and five independent clinical studies demonstrates improved biomarker sparsity and reliability compared to commonly used sparsity-promoting regularization methods while maintaining predictive performance; it distills datasets containing 1,400-35,000 features down to 4-34 candidate biomarkers. Stabl extends to multi-omic integration tasks, enabling biological interpretation of complex predictive models, as it hones in on a shortlist of proteomic, metabolomic and cytometric events predicting labor onset, microbial biomarkers of pre-term birth and a pre-operative immune signature of post-surgical infections. Stabl is available at https://github.com/gregbellan/Stabl .

Indexed as

BiomarkersMachine LearningComputational BiologyHumansMetabolomicsProteomicsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID38168992
PMCPMC11217152
OpenAlexW4390500913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.