Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168860›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2024

Relief of Obstruction in Left-Sided Obstructive Colon Cancer: Nationwide Analysis of Applied Treatment in the Palliative Setting.

J M L Sijmons, B Zamaray, J V Veld, A K Warps, J W T Dekker, J B Tuynman, H L van Westreenen, E C J Consten, P J Tanis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

J M L Sijmons *Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4914-4537
B Zamaray *Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2361-7578
J V VeldDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2826-1619
A K WarpsDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9070-3214
J W T DekkerDepartment of Surgery, Reinier de Graaf Groep, Reinier de Graafweg 5, Delft, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3429-468X
J B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5952-8000
H L van WestreenenDepartment of Surgery, Isala Hospital, Dokter van Heesweg 2, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-2723
E C J ConstenDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9447-8181
P J TanisDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9 Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.tanis@erasmusmc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3146-3310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor relief of bowel obstruction in left-sided obstructive colon cancer (LSOCC), a self-expandable metal stent (SEMS) or decompressing stoma (DS) can be placed. In a curative setting, these two strategies have been extensively studied as a bridge to elective resection. Guidelines recommend SEMS as the preferred option in the palliative setting, but adherence in daily practice is unknown. Therefore, this study aimed to gain more insight into patients with LSOCC who received palliative treatment with SEMS or DS at a national level.

methodsA retrospective population-based cohort study was conducted in the Netherlands. Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) on all patients with LSOCC treated with DS or SEMS not followed by resection of the primary tumour between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019, were analysed. Type of treatment (DS or SEMS) for different clinical scenarios, was the main outcome of this study, and was also evaluated over the years (2015-2019).

resultsPalliative treatment with SEMS or DS for LSOCC was performed in 1077 patients, of whom 79.2% had metastatic disease (M1). Patients without metastatic disease (M0) were older (≥ 80 years M0 67.4%, M1 25.3%, P < 0.001), had a worse clinical condition (ASA III 51.4% versus 36.37%, ASA IV-V 13.3% versus 4.0% P < 0.001) and presented with higher tumour stage (cT4 55.4% versus 33.5%, % P < 0.001). DS was performed in 91.5% of the patients and SEMS in 8.5%. The proportion of DS did not significantly differ between patients with M1 and M0 (91.8% vs. 90.2% respectively, P = 0.525). No increase in SEMS application was observed over the years, with a stable overall proportion of DS of 91-92% per year. In the multivariable analyses, ninety-day mortality and overall survival were not significantly different between SEMS and DS.

conclusionsThis study revealed that DS was the primary treatment modality for palliative management of LSOCC in the Netherlands between 2015 and 2019, while the guidelines recommended SEMS as preferred treatment. For patients with LSOCC eligible for stenting in the palliative setting, SEMS placement should become more available and accessible as the preferred treatment option, to avoid a stoma in the terminal phase of life.

Indexed as

Colonic NeoplasmsIntestinal ObstructionPalliative CareSelf Expandable Metallic StentsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsRetrospective StudiesDecompressing stomaLeft-sided obstructive colon cancerPalliativeStent

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.