Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168857›Full record

SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Impact of Endometriosis Surgery on In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

M Bourdon, M Peigné, C Maignien, D de Villardi de Montlaur, C Solignac, B Darné, S Languille, S Bendifallah, Pietro Santulli

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Association ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Endometriosis and In Vitro Fertilization.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M BourdonDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Université de Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France.
M PeignéDepartment of Reproductive Médecine and Fertility Preservation, AP-HP, Hopital Jean Verdier, Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Faculté de Santé, Bondy, France.
C MaignienDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Université de Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France.
D de Villardi de MontlaurDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, CHU de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
C SolignacGedeon Richter France, 75008, Paris, France.
B DarnéMonitoring Force, 78600, Maisons-Laffitte, France.
S LanguilleMonitoring Force, 78600, Maisons-Laffitte, France.
S BendifallahDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, AP-HP, Hôpital Tenon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Est Parisien, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France.
Pietro SantulliDepartment of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Université de Paris Cité, Faculté de Santé, Paris, France. pietro.santulli@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-4985-7326

Funding

unrestricted grant Gedeon Richter France
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis-related infertility remains a therapeutic challenge. A burning issue in this field of research is determining whether pre-assisted reproductive technology (ART) surgery may be of some benefit in terms of reproductive outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at comparing ongoing pregnancy rates (OPR) and/or live birth rates (LBR) in patients who underwent endometriosis surgery before ART (IVF/ICSI) in comparison with patients who underwent first-line ART (IVF/ICSI). Searches were conducted from January 1990 to June 2021 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library using the following search terms: endometriosis, surgery, reproductive outcomes, and IVF/ICSI. The primary outcomes were OPR or LBR. A total of 19 studies were included in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences in LBR [0.91[0.63, 1.30]; I

Indexed as

EndometriosisFertilization in VitroInfertility, FemalePregnancy RateSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicFemaleHumansPregnancyTreatment OutcomeARTEndometriosisIVF/ICSILive birthPregnancySurgery

Identifiers

PMID38168857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.