Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168782›Full record

ReviewNature food2024

Biofortification's contribution to mitigating micronutrient deficiencies.

Jie Li, Cathie Martin, Alisdair Fernie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature food, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Horticulture research · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jie LiDepartment of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK.
Cathie MartinDepartment of Biochemistry and Metabolism, John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK. cathie.martin@jic.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3640-5080
Alisdair FernieMax-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Pflanzenphysiologie, Potsdam, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9000-335X

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/J/000PR9790RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/J004596/1RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/P012523/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofortification was first proposed in the early 1990s as a low-cost, sustainable strategy to enhance the mineral and vitamin contents of staple food crops to address micronutrient malnutrition. Since then, the concept and remit of biofortification has burgeoned beyond staples and solutions for low- and middle-income economies. Here we discuss what biofortification has achieved in its original manifestation and the main factors limiting the ability of biofortified crops to improve micronutrient status. We highlight the case for biofortified crops with key micronutrients, such as provitamin D

Indexed as

MalnutritionTrace ElementsBiofortificationFood, FortifiedHumansMicronutrientsVitaminsMicronutrientsTrace ElementsVitamins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.