Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38168772›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2024

Human Purkinje cells outperform mouse Purkinje cells in dendritic complexity and computational capacity.

Stefano Masoli, Diana Sanchez-Ponce, Nora Vrieler, Karin Abu-Haya, Vitaly Lerner, Tal Shahar, Hermina Nedelescu, Martina Francesca Rizza, Ruth Benavides-Piccione, Javier DeFelipe and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
12.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Sometimes extracellular recordings fail for good reasons.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cerebellar astrocytic alterations in depression.Translational psychiatry · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 4 countries.

Stefano MasoliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0660-9952
Diana Sanchez-PonceCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Nora VrielerFeinberg school of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Karin Abu-HayaDepartment of Neurobiology and ELSC, Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Vitaly LernerDepartment of Neurobiology and ELSC, Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1222-8603
Tal ShaharDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Hermina NedelescuScripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Martina Francesca RizzaDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Ruth Benavides-PiccioneCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Javier DeFelipeCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5484-0660
Yosef YaromDepartment of Neurobiology and ELSC, Edmond J. Safra Campus, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Alberto MunozCentro de Tecnología Biomédica (CTB), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Egidio D'AngeloDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy. dangelo@unipv.it.ORCID 0000-0002-6007-7187
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILInstituto Cajal · ESUniversity of Pavia · ITFondazione Istituto Neurologico Nazionale Casimiro Mondino · ITNorthwestern University · USScripps Research Institute · USShaare Zedek Medical Center · ILUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad Politécnica de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purkinje cells in the cerebellum are among the largest neurons in the brain and have been extensively investigated in rodents. However, their morphological and physiological properties remain poorly understood in humans. In this study, we utilized high-resolution morphological reconstructions and unique electrophysiological recordings of human Purkinje cells ex vivo to generate computational models and estimate computational capacity. An inter-species comparison showed that human Purkinje cell had similar fractal structures but were larger than those of mouse Purkinje cells. Consequently, given a similar spine density (2/μm), human Purkinje cell hosted approximately 7.5 times more dendritic spines than those of mice. Moreover, human Purkinje cells had a higher dendritic complexity than mouse Purkinje cells and usually emitted 2-3 main dendritic trunks instead of one. Intrinsic electro-responsiveness was similar between the two species, but model simulations revealed that the dendrites could process ~6.5 times (n = 51 vs. n = 8) more input patterns in human Purkinje cells than in mouse Purkinje cells. Thus, while human Purkinje cells maintained spike discharge properties similar to those of rodents during evolution, they developed more complex dendrites, enhancing computational capacity.

Indexed as

CerebellumPurkinje CellsAnimalsDendritesHumansMiceNeurons

Identifiers

PMID38168772
PMCPMC10761885
OpenAlexW4390496577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.